Quantcast
Channel: ART and ARCHITECTURE, mainly
Viewing all 1213 articles
Browse latest View live

Harold Freedman - Melbourne's artist for the people

$
0
0
Harold Freedman (1915–99) was born in Melbourne and educated at Melbourne Technical Col­lege. Starting his long career in 1936, he worked in all public arts: port­raits, war propaganda, polit­ic­al car­toons, graphic design, ad­vertising, illust­ration, children’s books and large-scale murals.

Harold Freedman: Artist for the People was at the Art Gallery of Ballarat in 2017. Freed­­man’s designation as a people’s artist was seen in his democr­atic teaching style, his well-known murals, and his serv­ice as an Official War Artist in WW2. But whereasChristopher Allen (The Australian, May 2017) and blogger Black Mark thought the work was insensitive to modern art styles, Ballarat curator Julie McLaren believed the work was access­ible, democratic and full of honour for the WW2 soldiers.

In WW2, Freedman enlisted and became a war artist attached to the Royal Austral­ian Air Force Histor­ical War Records Sec­tion. He worked during 1944-5, in Bor­neo, Noemfoor and around Australia. Freedman and two other Austral­ian artists, Eric Thake and Max Newton, were all appointed to doc­ument the RAAF because the Army had previously dominated official art assignments. The more famous artist Sidney Nolan applied to be an official war artist, but was rejected. So he operated as an Unofficial War Artist instead. As did artist Albert Tucker.

Men of Service: The Welder, 
1947, 100 x 62 cm, 
National Gallery Aus, Canberra 

Men of Service: Signal Man, 
1947, 100 x 62 cm, 
National Gallery Aus, Canberra 

Freed­man honour­ed a group who felt under-valued by the public - he portrayed these men and women as noble and dignif­ied. Each image comprised of layers and layers of colour, as in magazines. His work was well represented in galleries, including The War Memorial in Canberra where his official portraits sustained the glamour surrounding the WW2 air force (handsome men in smart uniforms etc). His portraits were sometimes moody eg Wing Commander Clive Caldwall (1944) but always showed intel­lig­ent seriousness.

And see Freedman’s portrait of Victoria Cross winner, Pilot Of­ficer Raw­don Middleton. After his cock-pit was fired on over Italy, Middleton flew his damaged bomber over the Channel to allow his crew to safely bail out close to Britain. Middle­ton tragically died.

His portraits eg Alan Marshall (1943) and The Signal Man (1947) demon­strated great ability, works clearly influenced by Austral­ian black and white illustrators Norman and Lionel Lindsay. These qualities become even more apparent in painted portraits eg a member of the Women’s Auxiliary Australian Air For­ce, which was reproduced in the Royal Australian Air Force’s wartime pub­licat­ions.

Men and Women of Service was a post-war propaganda programme that emph­as­ised those who had worked in the Victorian Railways during the war. Because they had been required to remain working in essential services, these people had truly made an important con­tribution to the war effort! Freedman made large coloured litho­graphs that were displayed in Victorian railway stations.

Once again each figure was designed as socialist real­ist type. The station­master was stout and paternal, the signalman lean and an­x­ious. The medium and scale of lithography seem to make the feat­ures coarser than they would appear in paint­ing. But did they produce an effect that was readily recognised and much loved, OR profoundly cliched?

Post-war, Freedman taught at the Technical Coll­ege/RMIT, creating bold, colour-blocked pos­ters. In 1951 his work­shop for print­making was established at the College, but open for artists from the National Gallery School as well. Fred Williams, Charles Black­man, Kenneth Jack and Leonard French were the enthusiastic part­ic­ipants who began ex­hib­iting together in 1954. By 1960, Freedman arranged after-hours classes and brought the supplies. The Melbourne Print Group formed the found­ation for printmaking in the city’s art and technical colleges for many years.

Pilot Officer Rawdon Middleton, 
1946, 70 x 55 cm,
Aus War Memorial, Canberra


Murals The last third of the Ballarat exhibition was devoted to Freedman’s murals, beginning in the late 60s. His first large (4.5 x 60 ms) painted mural was commissioned by the Australian War Memorial. This metic­ul­ously researched work marked the 50th anniversary of the RAAF and formed a backdrop for the war memorial’s RAAF section.

An ABC docum­entary focused on the immense mural (10m x 40m) docum­ent­ing the history of transport in Victoria. One could see the work on the mural being completed, with the aid of a team of assistants. The painting studio was soon re­located to an old electricity sub-station where rail­way carpenters built a massive easel. The mural was plan­ned for a large wall at Spencer St Station, specifically left vacant for this pur­pose, and was to illustrate all the modes of transport during Vict­oria’s boom time from 1834 – horses, trains, trams, cars etc. It was unveiled in Jan 1978 with a gala parade of historic vehicles and vintage aircraft.

A large catalogue, written by Gavin Fry, David Freedman (art­ist’s son) and David Jack (another artist's son), noted Freedman enjoyed the chall­enge and made it central to his work, rather than seeing it as an irksome task. Freedman made art to entertain & colour the lives of working people.

Harold produced a series of paintings on the History of Flight for Tull­amarine’s new international terminal, opened in 1971. Freedman was the first and only person to ever serve as Victoria’s State Artist, appointed in 1972. Alas the History of Flight later ended up into storage.

 
Shop between 'off peak', 
1950s, railway lithograph, 97 x 60 cm 
National Gallery of Australia, Canberra

Harold’s aim was to create a very Australian ex­perience. See the Cavalcade of Transport mural, commis­sioned by the government for Spencer St railway stat­ion concourse. It showed every type of trans­p­ort used during the first century of Victoria’s European settle­ment. This massive work was completed by a team of artists in a giant build­ing in Brunswick, during 1973-7. The mural was later removed from Spencer St during the retail development of what is now Southern Cross Stat­ion, and only remains on display above shop-fronts in the Direct Factory Outlets. The artist’s pub­lic works had been compromised by prop­erty development.

The Regional History of Geelong was the first major mosaic mural created in the state studio. Harold created the full-size, colour painted cartoon and his assistants finished the mosaics, in total taking 2.5 years to complete. It can be seen today in the Geelong Art Gall­ery.

 The Legend of Fire mosaic, 1982
on the wall of the Eastern Hill Fire Brig­ade, Melbourne
Credit: Harold Freedman Tribute 

mosaic football mural
Waverley Park football ground, 1986
Credit: Harold Freedman Tribute


The Legend of Fire mosaic covers the wall of the Eastern Hill Fire Brig­ade’s headquarters and museum in Albert St East Melbourne. The colour cartoon was created in small and then manually enlarged to the installation size, five ambitious storeys high.

Harold next prepared vast murals for the Victorian Racing Club. The new Hill Stand at the Flemington Race-course was chosen to display the History of Australian Thoroughbred Racing. Midway into the project the newly elected conservative government made a change in arts policy and the studio suddenly became a priv­ate enterprise. At the invitation of the VCR chairman, artists coll­aborated on horses in Freedman's murals, completed in 1988.

Meanwhile Harold negotiated with the Victorian Football League to start a project celebrating the human form and football. His mural and the assistants’ mosaics were installed at the Waverley Park football ground in 1986. He was awarded the Order of Aust­ralia in 1989.






Ellis Island New York - a place of welcome or of discrimination?

$
0
0
Ellis Island is a small is­l­and in New York Harbour located in the up­per bay near the New Jer­sey coast. By the time Samuel Ellis became the island's private owner in the 1770s, Ellis Island developed into a harbour fort, ammun­ition and ordinance depot, and finally an immigration station. When the British occupied New York City during the Rev­ol­utionary War (1775–83), its large naval fleet sailed freely into New York Harbour. The Continental Congress voted for independence in 1776.

The Federal government eventually purchased Ellis Island from NY State in 1808. When the government realised its strategic value in defending against British invas­ion, they built a series of coastal fortificat­ions in New York Harbour. This was even before they knew about the War of 1812 between the USA, the UK and their respective allies. But the fort was not needed in the 1812 War and served only as an ammunit­ion storage. They built a parapet for 3 tiers of circular guns, plus two earthworks forts at New York Harbour’s entrance.

Ellis Island, first used for migrants in 1892.
Statue of Liberty in the background, dedicated in 1886 (above)
Britannica.com 

Potential immigrants waiting in the Great Hall, c1900 (below)


Before 1890, the individual states regulated immigration into the USA. Because New York Harbour was the ultimate destination of steamship companies, most immigrants entered the USA here. Or ports like Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, San Francisco, Savannah, Miami and New Orleans.

Then migrants came via Castle Garden in Manhattan, America's first official immigration centre. From 1855-90 Castle Garden served c8 million immigrants, mostly from England, Ireland, Germany and the Scandin­avian countries. Throughout the 1800s, European political instab­ility, nasty religious laws and deter­iorating economic conditions fuelled the largest mass human migration in world history. Thus these people constituted the first large wave of immigr­ants that populated the nation.

Clearly Castle Garden was too small to handle the grow­ing numbers of immigrants. And crooked immigration off­icials took bribes in exchange for letting immigrants get off in Manhattan, without first going through inspection at Ellis Island. The Federal govern­ment inter­vened and needed a new Federally-operated station on Ellis Island.

The new structure on Ellis Island opened in Jan 1892 and over the next 6 decades, 12+ million were to follow.

In June 1897, a fire on Ellis Island burned the facilities to the ground. Although no-one died, Federal and State immigrat­ion records since 1855 were utterly destroy­ed. The USA Treasury quickly ordered the immigration facility be rep­laced and all future structures built on Ellis Island had to be fireproof. In Dec 1900, the new Main Building was opened and 2,251 immigrants rushed in.

Third class passengers being physically examined

The 1st & 2nd class passengers who arrived in New York Harbour didn’t need to undergo the inspection process at Ellis Island. Instead they under­went a quick inspection aboard ship. If families could afford to pur­ch­ase quality tickets, the Federal government “knew” they would not become a burden to the state. 1st & 2nd class passengers were only sent to Ellis Island for further inspection if they were sick or had legal problems.

However steerage/3rd class immigrants travelled in crowded, unsan­itary conditions near the bottom of steam ships, sea sick in their bunks during rough Atlantic Ocean crossings. Upon arrival in New York City, the steerage passengers were transp­ort­ed from the pier by ferry to Ellis Island, to undergo medical and legal inspections.

Migration was rising at the turn of the century and in 1907 more people (c1.25 million) immigrated to the USA than any other year, including Catholics and Jews from eastern Europe. Tradesmen struggled to build new facilities to accommodate this great influx of new immigrants. Hospital buildings, dormitories, contagious disease wards and kitchens all were built as quickly as possible.


As the USA entered WW1, immigration to the USA decreased. In 1918-9, suspected enemy aliens were investigated onboard ship; at the docks they were transferred from Ellis Island so that the USA Navy with the Army Medical Department could control the island complex.

After WW1, a Red Scare spread across America & thousands of suspected alien radicals were interned & later deported. New arrivals faced rejection if they were anarch­ists, had a criminal record or showed poor moral character. So Ellis Island bears a sombre history as a detention centre for thousands of suspected communists and radical immigrants. Yet the overall number of people denied entry at Ellis Island was low; from 1892-1954, only c2% were rejected.

Nasty right-wing politicians demanded greater restrictions on immigration. Yet the Chinese Exclusion Act, the Alien Contract Labour Law and the institution of a literacy test barely stemmed the flood of new immigrants. So the Quota Laws (1921) and the Nation­al Origins Act (1924) were passed. These restrictions were based upon a percentage system according to the number of ethnic groups already living in the USA according to the 1890 & 1910 Censuses. It was an attempt to preserve the ethnic flavour of the old immigrants from North & West Europe, superior to all other races and ethnicities. The doctors who oversaw the medical examinations at Ellis Island led by example - Southern and Eastern Europeans possessed a deteriorating character which made restriction justifiable and necessary.

Ellis Island food tables for third class passengers

During WW2, enemy merchant seamen and Nazi sympath­isers were detained. And the USA Coast Guard also trained 60,000 servicemen there. But it all ended in Nov 1954 when the last detainee was released, and Ellis Island officially closed to immigrants. Aliens and deportees were moved out in Nov 1954 and the port was closed for good.

Starting in 1984, there was a major historic restoration of Ellis Island. The Main Building was reopened to the public in Sep 1990 as the Immigration Museum




Small pox, breakthrough doctors and the anti-Vaxxers

$
0
0
Giacomo Lorandi wrote of the pro-inoculation career of Theodore Tronchin in France and the anti-Tronchin response, to be followed by the anti-vaccination movement in Britain and the USA.

Swiss physician Théodore Tronchin's (1709–1781) clinic att­racted patients from everywhere and his reputation, esp­ecially for ground-breaking research on the prevention of smallpox through inoculation, grew. The Duke of Orleans, Louis-Philippe I (1725-85), summoned him to Paris to treat his children. His success in saving the children sparked interest in inoculation among the Parisian ar­istocracy and his rise to fame meant inocul­ation became wide­spread.

Tronchin’s work involved a tiny amounts of the smallpox virus taken from the pustule of a person afflicted with the dis­ease; it was injected into the superficial layers of the skin to induce immunity. Tronchin was a major advocate of a healthy lifestyle and phys­ical well being. He devoted time to the sick, listening to their symptoms; he sugg­ested an active lifestyle, good hygiene, outdoor activities and diet so that the body could react fully to diseases and to inocul­at­ion. He earned great popul­ar­ity in aristocratic circles, among Paris’ intellectual-artistic salons and at the royal court.

Only court aristocracy and foreign dignitaries were normally in­vited to court gatherings; magistrates, academics and men of letters were infrequently invited. But Tronchin’s access allowed him to meet a constant stream of new patients whom he recommended follow a more sober lifestyle. He renewed the air in a sick room; didn’t condemn pregnant women to an often-disastrous diet; gave children a healthier education, banned the bindings that deformed their size, or encouraged an unhealthy constitution.

Dr Théodore Tronchin 

Vaccination, as developed by the English physician Edward Jenner (1749–1823) in the 1790s, came later. It was an inject­ion of a sam­ple taken from a cow suffering from cowpox. It was con­sidered safer than inocul­at­ion and was the most common method used to fight against smallpox, polio, measles and tetanus. 

During the late 1800s, the mortality rate from small pox in non-inoculated infants approached 80% in London and 98% in Berlin. Inoculated children had up to a 2% mortality rate.

Dr Edward Jenner

Anti Vaxxers are not just a modern phenomenon. Tronchin’s success inevitably led to a campaign of hatred against him. Ammunition in­c­luded his contribution towards making inoculation popular, his being a foreigner, a Calvinist and his successes. His colleagues expressed doubts about the scientific basis of his inoculat­ions. Similar attacks came from the Church and from the University of Paris’ medical faculty.

So Paris’ medical est­ablishment revolted against him, especially his inoculation. He was labelled a medical pirate, who pract­ised for money alone, treated only those he believed capable of recovery and whose fame came from his rejection of both tradit­ional remedies (opium, emet­ics, quinine) and com­mon treat­ments (purgat­ives, blood lettings). His most vocal crit­ics were eminent doct­ors who criticised Tronchin’s empiricism and the simp­licity of his remedies. As did other opponents eg Prof Jean Astruc.

Widespread smallpox vaccination in Britain began in the early 1800s, following Edward Jenner’s cowpox experiments, in which he showed that he could protect children from smallpox if he infected them with lymph from a cowpox blister. But Jenner’s ideas were novel for Britain and were met with immediate public criticism. The rationale for criticisms of Jenner’s vaccinations included sanitary, religious, scientific and political objections.

Critics of vaccination opposed the smallpox vaccine in England in the mid to late 1800s. Anti-vaccination leagues emerged, as well as more recent vaccination controversies eg surr­ounding the efficacy of the diphtheria and tetanus immunisation and the MMR (measles/mumps/rubella).

The Vaccination Act of 1853 ordered mandatory vaccination for British infants up to 3 months old, and the Act of 1867 extended this age requirement to 14 years, adding penalties for vaccine refusal. The laws were met with immediate resistance from citizens who demanded the right to control their bodies and those of their child­ren. The British Anti Vaccination Leagues formed in response to mandatory laws, and numerous anti-vaccination journals sprang up.

Mass demonstrations and general vaccine opposition across Britain led to a commission designed to study vaccination. In 1896 the commission ruled that vaccination protected against smallpox, but suggested removing penalties for failure to vaccinate. The Vac­cination Act of 1898 removed penalties and included a conscientious objector clause, so that parents who feared vaccinat­ion’s safety or efficacy could be exempted.

Smallpox outbreaks in the USA led to pro-vaccine campaigns and anti-vaccine activity. The Anti Vaccination Society of America was founded in 1879, following a visit to America by leading British anti-vaccinationists. Other Anti-Vaccination Leagues followed in the 1880s.

The pustule-covered hand of a baby with a mild case of smallpox.
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention


In 1998, British doctor Andrew Wakefield recommended in­vest­igation of the relationship between bowel disease, autism and the MMR vac­cine. He alleged the vaccine was not properly tested before being put into use. The General Medical Council found that Dr Wakefield had a fatal conflict of interest; he’d been paid by a law board if he could support a litigation case brought by parents who believed that the vaccine had harmed their children. Dr Wakefield was struck off from the medical register in Great Britain. Since 2011, a large number of research studies assessed the safety of the MMR vaccine, none of which found a link between the vaccine and autism.

The next blog post will examine another medical history.







History of blood transfusions and soldiers at war

$
0
0
In 1628, Dr William Harvey was an English physician who published a book in which he described the circulation of blood in humans. Researchers commenced experim­ents involving the intraven­ous injection of various substances into an­imals, which progressed into blood transfusions between animals. Richard Lower, a member of the Oxford Experiment­al Group, showed that transfusion could be used in cases of severe blood loss by exsanguinating a dog and transfusing it with blood from another.

Dr Jean-Baptiste Denys (1643–1704) was personal physician to King Louis XIV and was noted for having performed the first fully docum­ented human blood transfus­ion. In 1667 he administered tran­sfus­ions of calf's blood to a man who died during the trans­f­usion. Denys was charged with murder and although he was acquitted, the practice of blood transfusion was deemed a crim­in­al act by the French parl­iament in 1670. The Royal Society soon began to dist­ance itself from blood transfusion and the next year Pope Innocent XI banned it. Experimentation was certainly slowed down.

Dr James Blundell (1790-1878) was an English obstetrician who perf­orm­ed the first successful transfusion of human-to-human blood, to treat a haemorrhage in 1829. Shortly after Blundell int­roduced two instruments for the purpose of transfusion: the impel­l­or and the gravitator. These apparatuses appeared in The Lancet of 1829.

Blood transfusion nurses, end of WW1 
Pinterest

Postpartum haem­orrhage, extreme malnutrition, puerperal fever, ruptured uterus and hydrophobia were all indications for trans­fusion then. A careful search of the literature revealed ten recorded transfusions performed by Dr Blundell but of these, only five were described as successful.

When the Franco-Prussian War (1870–71) was raging in Eur­ope, the possibility of using blood transfusions on the battle­field arose. Dr J Roussel of Geneva had first used his method of direct arm to arm transf­us­ion with success in 1865 for a patient with puerperal haemorrhage. The app­aratus he used was described in the Gazette des Hospitaux in 1867, though Roussel complained in 1876 that the app­aratus was not used as it might have been in the Franco-Prussian war. 

To overcome the hazard of coagulation and to prevent exposure of the donor's blood to air, obstetrician & gynaecologist Dr James Aveling made a sim­ple apparatus for direct transfusion from donor to recipient's vein in 1865. In 1872 a patient had suffered a severe postpartum haemorrhage; an immediate transfusion was made and the patient made a good recovery. And when no other therapies seemed to work with severe anaemia, trans­fusions were an established practice from the late 1870s up to WWI.

Not only did doctors not know how to stop blood clotting in the late C19th, but when they did manage transfusion, the patient often inexplicably died. It wasn’t until the C20th that different blood groups were discovered! Identification of three major blood groups was described by Nobel Prize winner Karl Land­st­einer in 1901. 6 years later, Czech neurologist Dr Jan Jansky accurately described four major blood groups (A, B, O and AB).

Yet despite new knowledge of blood groups and prev­ention of blood clotting, blood transfusion was not widely adopted during WW1. Note that in 1915, Capt OH Rob­ertson of Harvard Medical School dem­onstrated that blood could be safely trans­fused to wound­ed sold­iers. He developed the trans­f­usion bottle and pioneered un­iv­ersal donor blood, but the medical profession remained very sceptical. 
 
Dr Blundell's blood transfusion
The Lancet 1829

Having been impressed by a voluntary blood transfusion carried out in London’s King’s College Hospital, Percy Lane Oliver set up a vol­unteer panel of blood donors in 1921. This event­ual­ly led to the creation of the British Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service.

It was not until the Spanish Civil War that large-scale blood tran­s­­fus­ion became possible. This was among the first conflicts to re­sult in widespread targ­eting of civilians; Dr Frederic Durán-Jordà est­ab­lish­ed a blood transfusion service in Barcelona in 1936, for transfusing both soldiers and civilians. He was exiled to the UK after the Civil War and worked at the Hammersmith Hospital.

Dr Norman Bethune was a surgeon who was invited by the Committee to Aid Spanish Democracy to bring a surgical team to Madrid in 1936. Recognising the importance of bringing blood to wounded sol­d­iers and civilians rather than transporting patients to hospital for transfusion, Beth­une introduced the mobile blood bank to the men.

To help the war effort, the Plasma for Britain Campaign was created in the US. It was directed by Dr Charles Drew, who researched in the field of blood transfusions. He developed improved techniques for storage, and applied his expertise to developing large-scale blood banks early in WW2.

The main stimulus to develop blood and blood component therapy in the US was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour. Dr Edwin J Cohn of Harvard University developed a method of manufact­ur­ing albumin, a soluble protein found in blood plasma, for trans­f­usion. Initially made as a powder and later as a liquid, it used in the treatment of shock. It was to prove particularly important in the Pacific war and saved hundreds of thousands of lives on the battlefield.

The Korean War (1950–53) saw the in­vention of a simple plastic bag and led to a major devel­opment in blood transfusion. The bag had many advantages over the glass bottles, in terms of weight, storage and trans­p­ort. The first polyethylene blood collection bag had two tubes, one for blood collection and one to deliver blood to the recipient. War was always the major force in the organisation of blood supplies and stimulated the development of new medical technol­og­ies!

Thank you to Shaun McCann, George McLoughlin and Phil Learoyd.






Public art in rural Australia - grain silo murals

$
0
0
Victoria Spanning 200 ks across rural Wimmera-Mallee in Victoria, the fed­er­al and state-funded Silo Art Trail was designed to stimulate soc­ial, cultural and economic benefits to the region through art and tourism.

Famous Brisbane street artist Guido van Helten’s works adorn public walls in UK and Ireland, France, Ukraine, Bel­arus and Est­on­ia. He was invit­ed to Brim (pop 260 in the Wimmera) during 2015, and was asked to come up with a design inclusive of the locals. The project organ­is­er of  a Melbourne art management business said the project would cost $10,000, made possible with grants from Yarriambiack Shire, Regional Arts Victoria and the Brim Active Community Group, plus donations.

Luckily Guido always believed that silos had perfect sur­faces for painting street art. In Brim he painted a 30m x 30m scene dep­icting the Farmer Quartet across the four GrainCorp’s decom­mis­s­ioned grain silos. Created in van Helten’s famous monochromatic photo-realistic style, the Brim mural quickly became a regional land­­mark and provided the inspiration for The Silo Art Trail project.

“The site was no longer in use and the comm­un­ity had been looking at different ways to attract people to their town. Brim Active Com­munity Group wanted the artwork to attract more visitors to the drought stricken rural town, 350km northwest of Melbourne.

In the Grampians, travel to Patchewollock (pop 250) and see the work of Brisbane-based street artist Fintan Magee, sometimes refer­red to as Aust­ralia’s Banksy. Painted during Oct 2016, the giant mural depicts a local sheep and grain farmer, chosen for his clas­s­ic farmer looks and his strong connection to the farming community.

Another giant mural dedicated to Indigenous culture and knowledge emerged in Sheep Hills (pop 28), little more than a farming loc­al­ity on the rail line between Minyip and Warracknabeal. Well known artist Adnate painted the GrainCorp silo as part of the Yarriam­biack Shire Silo Art Trail, the third silo after Brim and Patch­ewollock. And the largest work (30m x 40m) that Adnate ever created.

Adnate is noted for working with Indigenous communities and for his renaissance-style chiaroscuro impressions, so the Sheep Hills project reflects this passion. He worked with the Barengi Gadlin Land Council to create his design, featuring two Wimmera Elders, along with a young boy and a young girl set in the night sky. The mural is about passing Abor­iginal culture and know­ledge from generation to generation. Appropriately there was a community event to launch the mural, gi­ven that the community was rapt with it and that it is so diff­erent from all the other silos.

Other Victorian silos have since been painted to make up a 200km silo art trail in the Wimmera and Mall­ee. These include silo art­work at the Lascelles silos. Melbourne street artist Rone depicted the faces of Lascelles couple whose famil­ies have lived and farmed in the area for generations and con­tinued the family tradit­ions of strong community involvement.

The Rupanyup grain storage was painted as a further part of the silo art trail in 2017. The artwork on the silos of two young lo­cals was completed by Russian artist Julia Volchkova, then the Wimmera Grains Store featured the same artwork on their chick pea and lentil packaging.

In late 2017 the silos at Rosebery, south of Hopetoun, were painted with giant murals. Melbourne street artist Katie Kaff-eine painted two farmers on the final silo in the Shire’s Silo Art Trail.

 Brim 


 Sheep Hills


Rupanyup

South Australia The Viterra manager for the Eastern region of South Australia saw the wonderful work Guido had done in Brim and other Victorian towns, and the flow-on benefits the art had had on those communit­ies. He noted that the Coonalpyn (pop 200) silos were still used and the company was pleased to be supporting the local commun­ity. In Feb 2017 artist Guido van Helten painted five fine port­raits of children at play on the town’s 30m-high grain silos. This silo complex painting is South Australia’s largest art “canvas”.

Van Helten said the design focused the circular features of the silo and encouraged visitors to move around for different viewing points. The mural is just one of six projects that are part of the council’s $100,000 Creating Coonalpyn initiative, bringing a sense of pride back to the community. This tiny rural town 160km south of Adelaide is already showing signs of rejuvenation and community pride. Motor­ists stop along the busy Dukes Highway to photograph the silos and two new businesses have opened in the town, with another one starting in August.

Another silo art project was officially opened in 2017 in South Australia. The silo at Kimba on South Austral­ia’s Eyre Peninsula displays 30-metre high artwork was done by Melb­ourne artist Cam Scale and features a colourful depiction of a Kim­ba sunset, wheat fields and a young girl. Cam Scale also completed a Geelong-based outdoor piece “To The Unknown Mariner”.

When the idea of commis­s­ioning the large-scale artwork on a Viterra grain storage facility in Kimba started, the community raised $60,000 to top up a $40,000 grant, thus funding the art project in the grain-growing community. The community hoped the art would attract visitors to the town 500km west of Adelaide, bringing economic benefits by getting travellers to park near the silos. 

Coonalpyn



Map of Western Victoria
Silo Art Trail

Now other towns are keen to catch a ride on the coat-tails of the Wimmera towns and the rush is on to convert the nation’s mothballed wheat silos into the world’s biggest art gallery. For example two artists transformed eight silos at Northam in Western Australia, and artworks appeared on the grain silos at Weethalle NSW, and in the Queensland town of Thallon








"Henry Ford and the Jews: The Mass Production of Hate by Baldwin

$
0
0
Henry Ford and the Jews: The Mass Production of Hate is by Neil Baldwin (published in 2002).

Baldwin reported that car manufacturer Henry Ford (1863-1947), inventor Thomas Edison and tyre magnet Harvey Fires­t­one used to go on motor-car expeditions to the Appalachian and New Eng­land hills. Normally, when the great business tycoons of the early C20th met, most of them generally kept their views hidden be­hind the fences of their very private country clubs. Ford, on the other hand, advert­ised his anti-Semitism almost as widely and loud­ly as he promoted his Model T. As did aviator Charles Lindbergh.

In 1919, Ford purchased The Dearborn Independent,  then a small newspaper published in the Michigan city where his factory was. For the next eight years, the weekly publication became a veh­ic­le for his bigoted political views. One of the paper’s chief targets was the “International Jew”, a sinister figure cited as the root cause of WWI. For 91 newspaper editions, the weekly paper announced a variety of Jewish-evil-influenced major stories in its headlines.

Henry Ford, The International Jew,  Nov 1920
Pinterest

The most popular and aggressive stories about the Jewish menace were then selected and reprinted in four volumes in 1920 called The Inter­national Jew: The World's Problem. To increase sales, Ford sent a memo to his car dealers saying that ev­eryone who bought a Model T would have to buy a sub­scription to his newspaper as well. A series of articles detailed Ford's belief that a cabal of Jews, a few super-men of the despised race, was plotting to subordinate the proud Gentile race. It was tran­slated into Ger­man, in 1922, and published in Germ­any where the book was a bestseller.

Note that Ford was the only American honoured enough to be mentioned by name in Hitler's Mein Kampf, published in 1925!

In 1927, a Jewish lawyer Aaron Sapiro sued Ford for defamation. In court, Ford refused to take responsibility for the articles that appeared in his newspaper. During the trial, the editor William Cameron testified that Ford had nothing to do with the editorials even though they were under his byline. The suit ended in a mistrial, but amongst all that bad publicity, Ford agreed to a private settlement with Sapiro. Ford issued a pissy public apology for his newspaper’s years of defamatory content and quickly sold the Independent.

We might understand how deeply embedded anti-Semitism was in the culture of Ford's youth. But why did Ford go on his anti-Jewish crusade so publicly - with prejudices that wiser businessmen kept to them­sel­ves? Because Jews didn't accept Jes­us as the Messiah?

Note that Ford Motor Co. has long been under fire because its German subsidiary used slave laborers during WW2 while building military vehicles for the Nazis. Eventually the company issued a lengthy report in 2001, finding itself innocent. Yet Ford had eagerly collaborated with the Nazis, helping Hitler prepare for war and, after the 1939 invasion of Poland, conduct the war. Ford’s behaviour in France following the German occupation of June 1940 showed its collaborationist posture even more disturbingly.

In late 1941, Ford Werke's board worried that the USA would enter the war in support of Britain and the government would conf­iscate the Cologne plant. To prevent such an outcome, the Cologne management wrote to the Reich Commission that year to say that it questioned whether Ford must be treated as enemy property, even in the event of a USA declaration of war on Germany. Ford became a purely German company and took over all obligations so succ­ess­fully that the American majority shareholder actually contributed to the develop­ment of German industry.

So Hitler's respect for Henry Ford was clearly based on his apprec­iation of Ford's production techniques, not on their shared anti-Semitism. “We look to Heinrich Ford as the leader of the growing Fas­cist movement in America; I regard him as my inspirat­ion”, Hitler said in an inter­view.

Ford's publishing arm also distributed The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, a book that was to become the bible of modern anti-Semitism. A supposed master plan for Jewish world dominance, the book was actually a crude forgery, as Ford himself knew.

In 1933 Ford came under intense pressure and was sued for libel by a businessman named by Ford as a key member of the Jewish conspiracy. Ford settled out of court. “I am not a Jew hater, and I have never met Hitler”, he wrote in a statement to a Jewish publication that was widely reprinted by the Hearst news­paper chain. Yet 5 years lat­­­er Ford received the Grand Service Cross of the Supreme Or­der of the German Eagle, a Nazi medal presented on his 75th birthday.

Ford receiving the Grand Service Cross of the Supreme Or­der of the German Eagle, 
presented in Michigan in July 1938 
by the two German consuls Kapp and Heller.

Look at the date. Hitler was becoming militaristic in Europe, and Americans were beginning to fear another World War. Americans had little time for the paranoid fantasies of the car king, and the Ford Motor Company was distancing itself from the views of its own founder.

Henry Ford was not the only head of industry who opposed America's entry into WW2. But he may have been one of the few who declared WW2 as the product of greedy financiers who sought profit in human destruction. Furthermore he announced that the torpedoing of American merchant ships by German submarines was the result of conspiratorial activities undertaken by Jewish financiers and war-makers.
Into his final decade of life, after several strokes and mental crises, Ford's anti-Semitism became even more paranoid than earlier on. Ford’s private notebooks show that he continued to view Jews as part of an "anti-Ford Motor Co conspiracy", involving financiers, the New Deal, labour unions and his major auto competitors. He died in 1947.














Norman Rockwell Museum - a lifetime of special art

$
0
0
The Chase School of Art opened to students in 1896 and two years later it became the New Yorker School of Art. New Yorker Norman Rockwell (1894-1978) enrolled in art classes at this school in 1908. Two years later, in 1910, he left high school to study art at The National Academy of Design and then The Art Stud­ents League. Thomas Fogarty and George Bridg­man were excellent teachers, preparing Rockwell for professional commissions.

No Swimming, 1921
Saturday Evening Post

While still very young, Rockwell was hired as art director of Boys’ Life, the publication of the American Boy Scouts, and illustrated a range of young people’s publications.

In New Rochelle, Rockwell set up a studio with a cartoonist and produced work for such magazines as Life, Literary Digest and Coun­t­ry Gentleman. In 1916, 22-year-old Rockwell painted his first cov­er for The Saturday Evening Post, and for five decades, 321 Rockwell more covers appeared on the front of the Post.

The 1930s and 1940s were seen as the most creative decades of Rock­well’s career. In 1930 he married a school tea­ch­er. The couple and their three children moved to Arlington Verm­ont in 1939, and Rock­well’s work began to reflect small-town Amer­ican life. 

During WW2, Rockwell put a nationalist and supportive view on daily life in America's home front, with famous paintings that appeared on the covers of The Saturday Evening Post. My favourites are those addressing the important roles that women could fulfill. See, for example, We Can Do It! 1942 and  Rosie the Riveter 1943. His simple way of capturing everyday life in his art was appealing.

We can do it, 1942
Norman Rockwell Museum

Rosie the Rivetter 1943 
an energetic red-headed woman, holding a riveting gun and eating a sandwich.
Norman Rockwell Museum

In 1953, the Rockwell family moved from Arlington Vermont to Stockbridge Ma. The question remained: how homey and sentimental were his small-town images, espec­ially in an era that required massive political commitment? Inspir­ed by President Franklin Roosevelt’s 1943 address to Cong­ress, Rockwell created his important Four Freedoms paintings. Four Sat­ur­day Evening Posts had essays by contemporary writers, along with Rock­well’s interp­ret­at­ions of Freedom of Speech, Freedom to Worship, Free­d­om from Want and Freed­om from Fear proved to be en­or­mously popular. The works toured the country in an exhibition that was jointly spons­ored by the Evening Post and the US Treasury Depart­ment, to raise millions for the war effort.
 
Runaway Boy 1958
being looked after by a friendly policeman

Although the Four Freedoms series was a great success, we don’t find much serious analysis of American life until Rockwell ended his 47-year association with The Saturday Evening Post in 1963. He began to work for Look magazine, specifically to allow himself more freedom in pursuing the art of serious social issues. During his 10-year association with Look magazine, Rockwell painted pictures illust­rat­ing some of his deepest concerns, including civil rights and America’s war on poverty.

However do note that in the midst of a racial deseg­reg­ation battle at an all-white New Orleans public school in Nov 1960, Rockwell painted a famous, civil-rights-inspired painting. I am very proud of The Problem We All Live With (1964).

Stockbridge Museum
Norman Rockwell created art in some 20 studios during his life, but it was the last one in Ma. that he loved the most and in which he lived the longest. This museum was founded in 1969 in Main St, Stockbridge in a build­ing known as the Old Corner House. In 1973, Rockwell established a Trust to preserve his artistic legacy by pl­acing his works in the custodianship of the Old Corner House Stock­bridge Historical Soc­iety, later to become Norman Rockwell Museum. The Trust now forms the core of the Museum’s permanent collections. As he became elderly, Rockwell became concerned about the future of his studio. He arranged to have his studio and its contents added to the Trust.

The museum moved to its current location 24 years later, opening in April 1993. The building on a 36-acre site overlook­ing the Housatonic River Valley was designed by Robert AM Stern. It was dedicated to the enjoyment and study of Rockwell’s work and his contributions to society, popular culture, and social commentary.

The Museum’s location is perfect; the artist loved the town, and it loved him back. Many of Rockwell’s best images were drawn from everyday locals he knew well eg family, friends and neighbours. 

The Norman Rockwell Museum,
Stockbridge Ma

Red Lion Inn
Stockbridge Ma

The lower level of the Norman Rockwell Museum has a dense exhibit dedicated to Rockwell’s 323 covers for The Saturday Evening Post over the 47 years he worked with them. Arranged chronolog­ic­ally, the framed covers fill the room’s walls. It is fascinating to watch how Rockwell’s style grew and changed over the years.

The New York Times says that for many years, the museum presented the studio as it was when Rockwell died in 1978. Now they’ve turned back the clock to October 1960, an active time in Rockwell’s career when he was hard at work on Golden Rule, the famous painting which later app­eared on the cover of the Saturday Evening Post. Working from highly detailed photos, the curators of the installation at the Norman Rockwell Museum applied great detail to their task, as Rockwell did to his. From his books to his radio, they’ve returned every aspect of the room back to 1960, to prov­ide some greater insight into the artist and his work.

In addition to 998 original paintings and draw­ings by Rockwell, the museum also houses the Norman Rockwell Archives, a collection of 100,000 various items, which include fan mail and business documents. Rockwell painted from photographs rather than real-life models, so his photographs are included in the Archives.

Rockwell’s Stockbridge studio, on the Museum site, is open to the public May-Oct, and features original art materials, library and furnishings. Stockbridge’s second greatest treasure is the historic Red Lion Inn which is redolent with rustic New England charm. Plus it is within walking distance of the Museum.







The meaning of British surnames - Ancestry.com

$
0
0
The names Australians gave new born babies was a widely cited post, covering the most popular first names given to boys and girls in Victoria since 1900.

But I have never tackled surnames, given that everyone of my generation seemed to come from Poland, Russia, Ukraine, Czechoslovakia, Hungary or Germany. Ancestryshows that many families actually have surnames passed down from ancestors in Britain. Last names were not widely used until after the Norman conquest in 1066, but as the country’s population grew, people found it necessary to be more specific when they were talking about somebody else. Thus arose descriptions like Thomas the Baker, Norman son of Richard, Henry the Whitehead, Elizabeth of the Field and Joan of York that ultimately led to many current surnames. 

There are perhaps 45,000 different English surnames, but most had their origins as one of these types.

1. Occupational
Occupational names identified people based on their job or position in society. Calling a man Mr Carpenter indicated that he worked with wood for a living, while someone named Knight bore a sword. Other occupational names include Archer, Baker, Brewer, Butcher, Carter, Clark, Constable, Cooper, Cook, Croft, Dean, Dyer, Farmer, Faulkner, Fisher, Forester, Full­er, Gardener, Glass, Glover, Head, Hunter, Judge, Mason, Miller, Page, Park­er, Parsons, Porter, Pot­ter, Sawyer, Slater, Smith, Stone, Taylor, Thatcher, Turner, Weav­er, Webb, Woodman, Wain­wright.

In medieval England, before the time of professional theatre, craft guilds put on Mystery or Miracle Plays, which told Bible stories and had a call-and-response style of singing. A part­icipant’s surname eg King, Lord, Pope, Virgin or Death, may have reflected a role which some people played for life and passed down to their eldest son.

Victorian family portrait 
Photo credit: The History Press

2. A personal characteristic
Some names, often adjectives, were based on descriptive nicknames. They may have described a person’s size (Short, Long, Little), colouring (Black, White, Green, Red or Fox) or another character trait (Coy, Grey, Savage, Stark, Stern, Strong, Sweet, Swift, Peacock, Truman, Winter).

3. A place name
A surname may have pointed to where a person was born, lived, worked or owned land. It might be from the name of a house, farm, hamlet, town or county eg Bedford, Boroughs, Burton, Hamilton, Hampshire, Kipling, Lincoln, Spalding, Sutton, Thorpe, Trent, Wakefield, Warwick, Wilton.

Those descended from landowners may have taken as their surname the name of their holdings, castle, manor or estate eg Staunton. Windsor is a famous example in the British royal family.

Some surnames showed that the family came from another country eg Britten, Dane, Fleming, French, Lubbock/Lubeck.

4. A geographical feature of the landscape 
Consider the surnames Atwood, Bridge, Brooks, Bush, Camp, Fields, Forest, Greenwood, Grove, Fleet, Heath, Hill, Knolles, Lake, Moore, Perry, Stone, Wold, Underwood, Waters, Wood and Woodruff.

Trees also gave names like Ashley, Elm, Hazelthwaite, Maple, Oakham, Palmer (which also had a meaning for pilgrims).

5. Patronymic, matronymic or ancestral
Patronymic surnames came from a male given name eg Benson, Davis, Dawson, Evans, Harris, Harrison, Jackson, Jones (Welsh for John), Nicholson, Richardson, Robinson, Rogers, Robertson, Simpson, Stephenson, Thompson, Watson, Wilson. Matronymic ones, surnames derived from a female given name, include Madison (from Maud).

Scottish clan names created a set of ancestral surnames. These include Armstrong, Cameron, Campbell, Crawford, Douglas, Forbes, Grant, Henderson, Hunter, MacDonald and Stewart.

Some surnames honoured a patron. Hickman was Hick’s man (Hick being a nickname for Richard). Kilpatrick was a follower of Patrick.

If readers are wondering whether their family name was English, Ancestry invites them to plug their surname into the Ancestry Last Names Meanings and Origins widget.

I have added many other surnames from Behind the Name and from the BBC








Helena Petrovna Blavatsky and Theosophy - or trickery?

$
0
0
The first part comes from the Blavatsky Archives; many thanks. Helena Petrovna von Hahn was born at Ekaterinoslav in Southern Russia, in 1831. She was the daughter of Colonel Peter von Hahn, and writer Helena de Fadeyev. Her mat­er­nal grandmother was Princ­ess Helena Dolgorukov, noted botanist-writer. After her mother’s early death in 1842, Helena was brought up with the grand­parents. This clever linguist was a sensitive child, and was soon aware that her psychic powers puzzled others.

At 18 she married the much older Nikifor Blavatsky, Vice-Governor of Yerivan Province. The marriage was never consummated and she soon escaped and travelled across Turkey, Egypt and Greece. Only 2 years later, in London in 1851, she met the Mahatma/Master Morya of her childhood visions, and fully accepted his guidance.

In 1852, Helena left for Canada, the USA, Mexico, South Am­erica and the West Indies, then went via the Cape to India and Tibet. Then to Britain, America again, India via Japan and the Straits. She entered Tibet through Kashmir, under-going part of her occult training with her Mahatma. She was again in France, Germany and Russia. From 1860-5, she lived in the Caucasus, exper­iencing a severe phys­ical and psychic crisis. She travelled via the Balkans, Greece, Egypt, Syria and Italy. Then to India & Tibet, meeting the Mahatma Koot Hoomi. Then back to Cyprus, Greece and the Middle East.
 
The Extraordinary Life & Influence of Helena Blavatsky,  
by Sylvia Cranston, 
TarcherPerigee, 1993

Why the constant travel? In 1873, Helena was specifically instructed by her Teacher to go to New York to meet Col Henry Olcott. The Mahatmas believed Helena was the best means to offer the world the accum­ulated Wisdom of the ages, verified by generations of Seers; that body of Truth of which all re­ligions were bran­ches of one parent-tree. They co-founded the Theos­ophical Society of America  in Nov 1875, where Olcott was made President for life.

The Theosophical Soc­iety's goals were to:
a] form a nucleus of the Universal Brother­hood of Humanity, regardless of race, creed, sex, caste or colour;
b] encourage the study of Comparative Religion, Philosophy and Science and
c] investigate the unexplained laws of Nature.

Helena’s first monumental work Isis Unveiled was published in New York in 1877, outlining the development of the Occult Sciences and of Magic. Her task was to chal­lenge both the entrenched dogmas of Christian Theology and the dogmatic materialistic view of Science.

Arriving in Bombay in Feb 1879, Helena and colleagues established the Theosophical Headquarters. The Found­ers started their first journal The Theosophist in Bombay with Helena as editor, and the society experienced a rapid growth. Alfred Percy Sinnett, editor of The Pioneer of Allahabad, and Helena wrote The Occult World 1881 and Esoteric Buddhism 1883, both generating even more public interest in Theos­ophy. In May 1882 a large estate was bought near Madras for the Theo­soph­ical Headquarters.

Helena was busy writing her next work, The Secret Doct­rine. But it didn’t save her. A vicious attack by staffers Alexis & Emma Coulomb was erupting, about Helena’s fraudulent product­ion of psychic phenom­ena. She returned to Madras on Dec 1884 to sue the couple, but they'd already left.  Alas Helena was overruled by the Theosophical Soc­iety committee and resigned in disgust. She left India for ever.

The "Coulomb attack" was based on partially forged lett­ers, presumably written by Helena, with instructions to arrange fraudulent psychic phenomena. So London’s Society for Psychical Res­earch app­ointed a special investigative committee. Rich­ard Hodgson arrived in India to report on the Coul­ombs’ allegations, which the research committee published in Dec 1885. William Emmette Coleman, a leading spiritualist, was also involved in the Coulomb case. He left the USA for London to obtain from the Scottish missionary Patterson the "original" Blavatsky-Coulomb letters, and published scathing denunciations of Theosophy and HPB in spiritualist journals.

Blavatsky was branded as one of the most acc­omp­lished impost­ors in history, and probably a Rus­sian spy. The Hodgson Report was the basis of later attacks on Helena’s and Theosophy’s honesty. Madame Blavatsky was soon called a plagiarist,  con artist, trickster and a manipulator of males. Coleman focused on her plagiarism.

Madame Blavatsky and Colonel Henry Olcott
London, 1887 (Wiki)

Blavatsky’s health was damaged, so she focused on writing. The Secret Doctrine was the peak of her literary car­eer. Vol. I dealt with the evolution of the Universe, and the fundam­ental symb­ols of the world’s great religions. Vol. 2 de­scribed the evolution of humanity.  Then Blavatsky published the devotional mystical work called The Voice of the Silence, trans­lated from an Eastern scripture. 

Helena Blavatsky aged 60 died in London in May 1891. Her ashes were divided between New York, London and Madras.

**

How important was Theosophy in modern history? Evidence suggested it significantly influenced the development of other mystical, phil­osophical and religious movements. And even psychological movements in the West. Supporters said Helena was among the mod­ern world’s innovative psychol­ogists of the visionary mind. At the same time that Freud and others were articulating their secularised theory of mind, the Theosophists were rescuing a forgotten psych­ology of the extra-sensory from exotic religion.  Madame Blavatsky was setting the style for modern occult literature.

Theosophy also influenced the growth of Indian national con­scious­ness, inspiring key figures in the Indian independence move­ment. In Nov 1889 Gandhi met Blavatsky. He did not join the Theosophical Society because, with poor knowledge of his own religion, he did not want to belong to any religious body. However in March 1891, he became an associate member of the Blav­atsky Lodge. Three months later Gandhi returned to India. Nehru learned the mys­terious philosophy of Theosophy with his childhood tutor Ferdinand Brooks. Young Nehru (13) was initiated into the Theos­ophical Society in 1902 by Annie Besant, a Theosophist who supported home-rule for Ireland and India.

Was Theosophy the most important avenue of Eastern teaching to the West? Rudolf Steiner said yes. He first began speaking publicly about spiritual experiences in his 1899 lectures to the Theosophical Society. Steiner kept Helena’s original approach, replacing her terminology with his own. Sylvia Cranston noted theosophy’s influence on important art­ists, writers and composers like TS Eliot, Wassily Kandinsky, Boris Pasternak, Paul Gauguin, James Joyce, William Butler Yeats and Jean Sibelius.

The Theosophist monthly journal, 1885
published in Madras 
edited by H.P Blavatsky

And consider the importance of Blavatsky and the Theosophical Society in the feminist movement, as described in Theosophy, Gender and the New Woman by Siv Ellen Kraft. Theosophy downplayed the importance of marriage, insisted upon the spiritual independence of women, included women on all levels of the organisation, and gave formal religious authority to women. Blavatsky described the suppression of women as typical of all religions, but was taken to the extreme by Christianity.





two great museums in Leipzig - Johann Sebastian Bach and Felix Mendelssohn

$
0
0
I've long been interested in Leipzig’s musical connections. Now I'll summarise the details published in Discover Leipzig and focus on the historic Bose House-museum.

Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750) was active in Leipzig’s musical life from 1723 on. He was responsible for the services and special cer­emonies at the churches of St Nicholas and St Thom­as. And, as the city's Director Musices, he was also charged with the organ­is­ation of a wide range of secular events. He directed an association of pro­f­essional performers and musically active students.

Many of his major compositions were written in Leipzig, including annual cycles of choral cantatas, St John and St Matthew Passions, Christmas Oratorio, Art of the Fugue and his Mass in B Minor. Since the C19th no end of effort has been put into the study and interp­ret­ation of Bach's works in Leipzig, and several instit­ut­ions, societies and competitions have been established.

The Leipzig Music Trail is an easy way to explore the musicians who lived and worked in the city. The sites lie on a 5km stroll that winds through the city centre, marked by curved steel inserts in the ground. See the Bose Family HomeA C16th front home is one of the oldest buildings on the square outside St Thomas’s Church. The twin-aisled Ren­aissance entrance hall had imp­r­es­s­ive Tuscan columns and a portal with its porphyry Romanesque arch. The Bach family later lived across the street in St Thomas’ School, now demolished.

Bose Haus, Leipzig
now the Johann Sebastian Bach Museum


In 1710, the home was acquired by Georg Heinrich Bose, an af­f­luent manufact­urer of gold and silver products, who had it turned into a prest­igious Baroque merchant’s residence. The side wings and back building were newly erected by the Bose family. The façade of the front building has a two-storey bay window. In the rear build­ing, Bose installed a magnificent banqueting/concert hall, fitted with wall mirrors, a musicians’ gallery and a movable ceiling painting.

In 1745 Bose’s son-in-law Johann Zacharias Richter acquired the parental home, adding an extensive art collection of his own, and opening it to the public. From 1765 it was opened to connois­s­eurs on one afternoon each week for two hours. Among the celebrities who viewed the art treasures were Moses Mendels­sohn, Christoph Martin Wieland, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Tischbein and Jean Paul. The collection remained with the family until it was sold by auction in 1810. Some of these paintings are in Leipzig Museum of Fine Arts today.

In 1893, the instrument collector Paul de Wit opened a private mus­eum of music history in the old Bose House. Apart from hist­or­ical music instruments, the Paul de Wit's Museum of Mus­ic History gathered musical manuscripts, letters and port­raits of composers and instrument makers. Until de Wit’s death in 1925, the house was a meeting place for instrument makers, artists and publishers.

In 1973 the director of the Bach Archive erected a small Bach mem­orial in the Bose House entrance hall. Ex­tensive reconstruction took place in March 1985, then the Bach Archive was moved into what was now called the Johann Sebastian Bach Museum Leipzig. The first permanent exhibition was spread across four display rooms on one floor of the front building, as well as two small rooms for temporary exhibitions. More extension was added to the museum in 2000 and in 2008–2010, by including some of the neighbouring building at the back of the baroque courtyard.

Today its twelve thematically structured ex­hib­ition rooms are dedicated to the life/works of JS Bach, his family and to researching his rare original manuscripts. Displays include a double bass played in Bach’s orch­es­tra, surv­iv­ing furniture from his pers­on­al house­hold and Bach’s organ console from Leip­zig’s St John’s Church which he played in the 1740s.

Two exhibition rooms in the Johann Sebastian Bach Museum


Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy (1809-47) was born in Hamburg. He was the nephew of the philosopher Moses Mendelssohn and was one of the finest figures ever to emerge in the 19th century music world.  In Feb 1827 the première of his Symphony in C Minor at the Gewand­haus became the first public performance of his works in Leipzig. As Leipzig's important Gewandhaus Kapellmeister, Felix was resp­onsible for reforming the musical life of the city, instigating the “Bach Renaissance” in Germany. During his years in Leip­zig he worked hard to turn the orch­est­ra into one of the best in Europe. He shared in the founding of the Leip­zig Conservatory in 1843, and was very pleased that the first permanent staff included Robert Schumann. 

Mendelssohn Museum, Leipzig


The late-classical building houses the Mendelssohn Museum which was first opened to visitors in 1997. The composer lived here from 1835 until his death, and his study and salon, where Wagner, Schum­ann and Berlioz visited, have been faithfully rest­or­ed. Sun­day morning con­certs are still held today in the renovated music salon.

Until March 2013, the offices of the University of Leipzig’s Music Faculty were located in the building and the music branch of the University Library as well. Then the extended Mendelssohn House reopened in 2014 with a new floor. Since October 2017, the world's only permanent exhibition about Felix’s talented older sister Fanny Hensel can be found in a number of rooms.




Ida Wells, a very special black-rights and women's-rights activist

$
0
0
Ida Wells (1862-1931) was the first child of James and Lizzie Wells who had been slaves of the Confederate states. The par­ents were freed by the Union, thanks to the Emancipation Proc­lamation in Dec 1862. However living in Missis­sippi, these African Americans still fac­ed racial prej­ud­ices and discrim­inatory practices.

As a member of the progressive Republican Party during Re­const­ruction, Ida’s father was involved with the Freed­man’s Aid Soc­iety - a group that sent a supply of teachers from the Nor­th and pro­­vided housing for them in the South. And James also served on the first board of trustees at Shaw Univ­ersity-Rust Coll­ege, a school that opened in Holly Springs MS for new­ly freed slaves in 1866.

Southern Horrors,
one of the many books and booklets written by Ida Wells

But Ida suddenly had to leave school when both of her parents and one sibling died of yellow fever in the 1878 epidemic; she became the primary care giver for her 6 surviving siblings! Only in 1882, when her broth­ers worked as carp­enter apprentices and her sisters moved to an aunt’s house in Memphis, could Wells study again at Shaw University.

On a Memphis-Nashville train ride in 1884, Wells had a 1st-class ticket. Unexpectedly the conductor ord­ered her to move to the 2nd class car for African Am­ericans; outraged, this brave black woman refused! As she was forcibly rem­ov­ed from the train by the conductor and some passengers, she bit a conductor’s hand. Wells returned to Memphis and sued the Chesapeake-Ohio Rail­road Co, winning a settlement of $500. The Railroad Co appealed, and in 1887 the Supreme Court of Tennessee ordered Wells to pay court fees instead.

This double humiliation led Ida Wells to write about race and politics. She wrote editorials in southern black news pap­ers, chall­enging the infamous Jim Crow system that legalised segregation.

Ida was offered a job in, then bought a share of a Mem­phis newspaper, the Free Speech and Headlight.

Shaw Univ­ersity-Rust Coll­ege,
Holly Springs Mississippi
opened for new­ly freed slaves in 1866.

While working as a journalist and publisher, Wells also held a position as a teacher in a segregated public school in Mem­phis. She became a vocal critic of the condition of blacks-only schools in the city, and was fired from her job!

Wells first became very well known internationally as an act­iv­ist when she brought attention to the lynching of African Americans in the South. In 1892, African-American Tom Moss, Calvin McDowell and Will Stewart set up the Peoples’ Grocery Shop in Memphis. Their new, successful business drew customers away from local white-owned shops, so inevitably the white shop-owners and their supporters clashed with the black men.

One night, Moss and his friends guarded their shop against white men gathered to attack and injured several of the white vandals. The three black men were arrest­ed and brought to gaol, but didn’t get to court; a lynch mob took the three from their cells and murdered them.

After the brutal lynching of her friends, Wells put her own life at risk; she spent two months travel­ling in the South, gathering information on other lynching incid­ents. One of her editorials infuriated some of the city's whites. A mob stormed the office of her newspaper, tearing the place apart. Fortun­at­ely Wells had been travelling to New York City at the time and was safe.

Bravely she went on to found groups striving for African-American justice. Wells wrote a detailed report on lynching for the New York Age, an African-American newspaper. In 1892 she published the book Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases, detailing her findings.

The Peoples’ Grocery Shop in Memphis
ran by African-American Tom Moss, Calvin McDowell and Will Stewart 
Photo credit: Memphis History

She was teaching, looking to raise support for her cause among reform-minded whites. Upset by the ban on African-American exhibitors at the 1893 World's Columbian Exposition in Chicago, Wells protested the ban by writing a pamphlet called "The Reason Why the Coloured American Is Not Represented in the World's Columbian Ex­position." Her project was supported by the famous abolit­ion­ist lawyer-editor Ferdinand Barnett. [He had been the third black person to be admitted to the Illinois bar; his first wife Molly had been the first black woman to graduate from the University of Michigan].

Wells took her movement to England, and created the Brit­ish Anti-Lynching Society in 1894. She came home, settled in Chicago where she married her beloved Ferdinand Barnett in 1895, a widower with two children of his own. While the couple event­ually had another four child­ren together, Wells rem­ained commit­t­ed to her social and political activism.

Wells wrote that during the post-war Reconstruction Era, whites ran mob lynchings to suppress black political activity and to re-establish white supremacy. Through her lectures and books eg Red Record: Tab­ul­at­ed Stat­istics and Alleged Causes of Lynching 1895, Wells dealt with the Rape Myth used by lynch mobs to justify the murder of African American males. 

In 1898 Wells brought her anti-lynching campaign to the White House, leading a protest in Washington DC where she visited President William McKinley (1897-1901).

After brutal assaults on African-Americans con­t­in­­ued in Springfield Ill in 1908, Wells att­ended a special conference for the Nat­ional Association of Coloured Women.

Ida Wells-Barnett House, the Chicago home of Ida and Ferdinand Barnett from 1919-30

In Chicago, she co-founded many African-American reform organisations. In March 1913, as Wells prep­ar­ed to join the suffrage parade through President Woodrow Wil­son (1913–21)’s inauguration in Washington D.C, march organisers asked her to leave. Apparently many middle-class white women had embraced the suffragists’ cause because they believed the vote would guarantee white supremacy (sic)!

The connection with Woodrow Wilson was important. As part of the National Equal Rights League’s role, Wells asked the Pres­ident to put an end to dis­crim­in­at­ory hiring pract­ices for government jobs.

In Chicago, Ida Wells and reforming social workers Jane Addams successfully blocked the establishment of segreg­ated schools. In 1930, Wells stood for the Il­linois State Leg­islature but failed. Alas her health problems continued; she died in Mar 1931 in Chicago, leaving behind a powerful written record of her lifetime crusading for justice.






Children and Dogs – A Bridge to Nature guest post

$
0
0
In Nov 2016, Animal Medicines Australia released its Pet Ownership in Australia Report, providing insight into the state of pet ownership in this country.  At 62%, Australia continues to have one of the highest household rates of pet ownership in the world with 5.7 million of Australia’s 9.2 million households home to a pet. Dogs remain the most popular type of pet.

Melbourne's Royal Children's Hospital in its report agreed that pets are an integral part of  our lives as Australians - some 80% of Australians have an animal companion at some time in their life. Sometimes pet relationships are ranked higher than certain kinds of human relationships for comfort, esteem, support and confidence, with benefits in areas of child development, family harmony and health.

For a more detailed examination, let us go over to Mat Coulton of Wileypup, with thanks for his text, photos and links.

Recent scholarship has demonstrated the health benefits dogs offer their human companions. The scientific research found 15 ways in which positive health effects come from time spent with dogs! These studies have focused on measurable physical and mental health indicators such as lower levels of stress, reduced blood pressure and heart rates, lower levels of obesity, and decreased feelings of anxiety, depression and social isolation. 

However, our canine companions are also playing a role in how we understand the world around us by serving as a bridge between our modern lives and the splendour of the nature. In particular, they may be a valuable asset in helping children connect intellectually, emotionally and spatially with the environment.

An Age-Old Connection
It may surprise many readers to learn that the oldest domesticated animal that joined the human evolutionary journey was, in fact, Canis familiaris, the domesticated dog. Their presence as invited members in human societies predates horses and livestock.


In fact, this relationship with dogs is so old that modern science has begun to demonstrate evidence of the co-evolution of humans with these important companion animals. Not only has our social organisation been shaped by canines, our biological selves have likely been influenced by our cooperation with them.

The connection goes deeper than hand to harness, the relationship with dogs is clearly significant, however, what do we know about how they may be impacting the lives of our children? Let us take a closer look.

Empathy
Dogs have a way of reaching us with their unconditional love and loyalty. Children often develop empathetic bonds with dogs which is an important aspect of breaking through the often transactional and entertainment driven exchanges with modern technology.

Emotional Intelligence
Learning to understand that other animals have their own emotional reality is an important part of emotional intelligence, also known as EQ. It turns out that EQ is related to better mental health, lower rates of risky behaviour, and higher levels of educational success in children.

Interest in Biology
Interactions with dogs may prepare children to take an interest in learning about biology. Although this is an area in need of more study, research does show that children’s interest in and sense of basic biological concepts is improved by spending time with, and particularly taking part in the care of, our companion animals, such as pet dogs.

Curiosity
Dogs have a natural curiosity about the world around them that is simply contagious. They instinctively set about investigating the sights, feels, and smells of outdoor spaces inspiring adults and children alike to wonder about the mystery and adventure that awaits when we put down the video games and social media to take in wild spaces.


Environmental Stewardship
Caring for a pet gives children a chance to understand the positive impact that taking responsibility for the well being of others can have on our lives, including the care of non-human animals. Although solid research has yet to demonstrate the link, it seems likely that children’s relationships with dogs may contribute to fostering a sense of environmental stewardship if properly nurtured.

Teaching children about their agency to affect the natural world, including through their relationships with dogs, is a critical step towards creating a sense of empowerment relative to pressing environmental issues facing humanity today.

Perhaps this ancient partnership with a non-human ally is continuing to influence and shape the course of human history as a result!

Mat Coulton











Grand Duchess Anastasia Romanov - great pretenders

$
0
0
In July 1918 Bolshevik revolutionaries, acting on Mos­c­ow’s orders, shot Czar Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra, four daught­ers (Grand Duchesses Olga, Tatiana, Maria and Anastasia), their son Tsarevich Alexei Nikolaevich and four servants. Their bodies were taken from the Yekaterinburg cellar, in the Urals, and buried in the forest, yet a rumour got out that the body of the Grand Duchess Anastasia had not been accounted for. Did she hide in the closed cellar?

Since 1918 many women have presented them­selves as the missing Anastasia (or another sister). However only Anna Anderson and Eugenia Smith gathered substantial support. Thank you to True Crimes and Curiosities for much of the information .

The princesses Olga, Tatiana, Maria and Anastasia
Alexander Palace, 1916

Olga, Alexei, Anastasia and Tatiana
Under house arrest in Tsarskoe Selo, 1917
Last known photo of the Romanov siblings

A] In 1920 Anna Anderson tried to commit suic­ide and was sent to a mental health centre in Berlin. One of the pat­ients took her for the Grand Duchess and later this legend was supported by Russian immigrants. Two years later Anna started believing that she was in fact the real Grand Duchess Anastasia. In 1928 she moved to the USA and lived off Rus­sian princess Xenia Georgievna, who was actually distantly related to the Romanovs. However, after failing to prove herself, Anna returned to Germany.

Those who had known Anastasia personally said Anna Anderson was an imposter, but most ordinary people bel­ieved her. So the Tsarina of Russia’s brother Ernest Louis, Grand Duke of Hesse, hired a private investigator in 1927 to find out who she really was - Franziska Schanzkowska, a Polish factory worker suffering from mental illness

For 20 years Anna struggled to get her name recognised by the Eur­op­ean courts, but failed. In 1968 she moved back to the USA where she married a wealthy man. And­ers­on died there in 1984 and post-mortem DNA tests finally disproved her claim of being a Romanov. As they did for every other claimant mentioned here.

I saw the film Anastasia: The Mystery of Anna (1986) decades ago.

B] Eugenia Smith (1899-1997) was born Eugenia Smetisko. Accord­ing to her naturalisation papers, Eugenia was born and raised in 1899 in Bukovina, an artist & writer who emigrated to the USA in 1929. In Chicago in 1963 she presented a book to a publisher which she said was a manuscript given to her by the Grand Duchess Anast­asia herself. Doubt­ing her tale, the publisher asked her to take a lie detector test, which Smith failed. So she then changed her state­ment, instead claiming to be the Grand Duchess Anastasia.

In her book, Autobiography of HIH Anastasia Nicholaevna of Russia, Smith adopted 1901 as her birth date, same as the Grand Duchess, and changed her birthplace to St Petersburg. Her auto­biography recount­ed her life in the Imperial family and how she escaped ex­ecut­ion by the Bolsheviks. And her many art works depicted scenes of her Russian childhood in the Imperial family.

Eugenia was a popular society woman when LIFE mag­az­ine featured her claims in an Oct 1963 story. LIFE pointed out that she had failed to convince: a) anthropol­ogists (who compared her features to Anas­t­asia’s), b) a hand­writing analyst (comparing the two women’s hand­writing) and c) a cousin-childhood playmate of An­astasia. Eugenia died in 1997 in Rhode Island. Because cremation is forbidden in Orthodoxy, Eugenia Smith was buried in Orthodox manner in the Holy Trinity Orthodox Monastery in New York.

L to R: Anna Anderson, Eugenia Smith & Eleonora Kruger
True Crimes and Curiosities

C] Eleonora Kruger originally did not claim to be royalty, yet she had apparently written letters to the British King George V asking for help. She first claimed she was Anast­as­ia, then a merchant’s daughter, and then Anastasia again. Her changing claims led to her being inst­it­ut­ionalised in a mental hospital in Kazan on the Volga River, where she eventually died.

D] Marga Boodts first appeared in France just post-WW2. She claimed to be Grand Duchess Olga Nikolaevna of Russia, first daughter of Tsar Nicholas II and was considered to be one of the most successful claimants to the Romanov family. Having said she miraculously escaped the execution of the Romanov family, Marga collected money from the public to prove her cause. But in court she was arrested for fraud.

Marga appeared in court again in 1950, this time denying any know­ledge of her previous fraudulent activities. She could con­vince Nikolaus, the Hereditary Grand Duke of Old­en­burg and Wilhelm of her claim; he supported her finan­cially until their death. Only when Anna Anderson became famous did Boodts make her claim public - she did every­thing in her power to destroy Anderson’s credibility. And of course she wrote a book (unpublished) to tell the story of her family.

Boodts lived in solitude for the rest of her life in Italy, dying in 1976.

E] Ceclava Czapska was first noticed in 1919 in Romania where she was taken under the protection of Queen Marie of Romania. And it was there that Ceclava Czapska married Russian Prince Nicolas Dol­goruky, son of General Alexander Dolgoruky, and started claiming to be the Grand Duchess Maria of Russia. She said all members of the royal family, with the exception of her dad Nicholas II and the servants, escaped from being executed. Ceclava died in 1970 in Rome.

F] The last woman to declare that she was Anastasia was Natalya Bilikhodze, app­arently the heiress to a fabulous Georgian fortune, was aged nearly 101. Supp­ort­ers proved via a video press conference that Mrs Bilikhodze would visit Russia in 2002 when her real ident­ity would be acknow­ledged and the Romanov fortune would then be handed over to her. But it turned out that Bilikhodze had actually died back in 2000; the press con­ference video had simply been recorded years prior.

The canonisation of the dead Romanovs in Nov 1981 showed the Orthodox Church made them saints on the belief that they were all totally and irrev­oc­ab­ly murdered.

In 1991, the Tsar, his wife and 3 of their daughters were found in the woods outside Yekaterinburg. An exhaustive post mortem exam­in­ation con­firm­ed that they were the Romanovs. The family was buried in in a vault in Saints Peter and Paul Cathedral, St Petersburg.

This did not end the rumours because one of the four daughter might have still been alive. Then in 2007 the fourth daughter and the son were found partially cremated near Yek­ater­in­burg. It was never verif­ied if the fourth sister was Maria or Anastasia, but ALL the girls had been proven by DNA testing to be part of the royal family.




The kangaroo in WW1 - nationalist pride and homesickness

$
0
0
As shown in the photo below,  a toy kangaroo, made of brown velvet and with movable legs, was dated between 1914 and 1918. Pinned to it was a coll­ection of World War I fundraising badges made of mat­er­ials such as brass, enamel and glass. Some of the badges were first issued when the Australian Government wanted to identify and thank the nearest female relatives of members of the Aust­ral­ian forces on active service. Separate badges were issued to signify relatives serving in the Royal Australian Navy and the Australian Imperial Force.

Funds went to the repatriation and rehabilitation of sold­iers, the erection of war memorials, and to children and fam­ilies affected by the war in France & Belgium. At school, children learned about Empire, citizenship, national pride and duty. The war rein­forced their lessons and inspired them to contribute.

Australian diggers (soldiers) and a kangaroo, 
Mena Camp in Cairo, Dec 1914
Photo credit: Australian Geographic

Visitors can see this velvet kangaroo at the National Museum of Australia’s Terence Lane Collection, amassed by the former Senior Curator of Australian Art. With 180 objects of Australiana, pred­om­in­antly featuring the kangaroo, this is considered the best collection of kangaroo theme items in Australia and is therefore of important cultural value.

The kangaroo has long been a patriotic symbol, and one used widely in wartime. But not only toy kangaroo were popular. In the shadows of the great pyramids and amid kitbags and Lee-Enfield rifles, an Aust­ralian Imperial Force infantryman encounters a kangaroo. Skippy was on permanent shore leave at Mena Camp, the British Empire's training ground in Egypt. Members of the 9th and 10th Battalions smuggled these "mas­cots" from home aboard transport ships. The first Australian troops to arrive in Egypt in 1914 were proud to be serving the British Empire, and some men took kangaroos and wallabies aboard ship when they left home. Apparently they were a common sight in the Australian camps at Mena, Heliopolis and Ma'adi in 1914-15. There were at least a dozen, and they were mentioned frequently in soldiers' letters home.

These men had just signed up, voluntarily, for war. They were young, with not a lot of thought for the future. The soldier in the photo treat­ed the marsupial expat with tenderness and homesickness. It is be­lieved it ate the same food as the British force's horses and don­keys, a hay and chaff mix. In March 1915, after three months of milit­ary training, the men left Mena bound for Gal­lip­oli, bequeathing their mascot to the care of the Cairo Zoological Garden.

Velvet kangaroo and war badges 1914-8
National Museum of Australia

In 1915 recruiting committees were formed in nearly every sizeable town in Australia. In the central west of New South Wales a movement began under the leadership of Captain Bill Hitchen; 20 rural men enlisted and started to march to Syd­ney on the Kangaroo or Coo-ee March. Gath­ering other recruits along the way, they numbered about 300 by the time they reached the capital city. Their example was soon followed by other marches from around New South Wales and Queensland, includ­ing the Waratahs, Kangaroos, Wallabies, Men from Snowy Riv­er, Kook­aburras and Boomerangs.

The total number of  recruiters was only 1,500 but the marchers relied on the support of the towns they passed through, which was often enthusiastic. They attracted wide publicity, encouraging fund-raising and enlistment. The longest was the Kangaroo March in Dec 1915, going to Wagga Wagga, Junee, Cootamundra, Yass, Goulburn, Moss Vale, Campbelltown and ending at The Domain, Sydney.

Posters were used for various government propaganda campaigns over the course of WWI, most significantly to encourage enlistment, but also to raise money for war charities, to encourage saving and frugality and to rally the home front.

"Australia has promised Britain 50,000 more men. Will YOU help us keep that promise"
1916, lithograph, recruitment poster.
Australian War Memorial

**

World War One Love & Sorrow was an exhibition in the Melbourne Museum in Carlton back in 2014. It explored the enormous impact of the war on Australians. A shared experience in towns and cities across Australia was the worry of having loved ones serving overseas. Newspapers were searched for announcements of deaths and injuries. The sight of a minister or telegraph messenger approaching a family's front door could fill the family with dread. Many of the objects in this exhibition relate to WW1 in one street: Normanby Ave Caulfield, a typical street where almost everyone was touched by war.

Millions of letters were posted around the world during WWI; letters and cards were the only ways most people kept in touch.

Australian Christmas card 1916
posted home by servicemen and women. 
World War One Love & Sorrow exhibition







Bruges, a perfectly preserved medieval Belgian city

$
0
0
Bruges (pop 120,000) was founded in the north of Belgium in the C9th by Vikings who settled locally. A town developed around the fort­ress that the Counts of Flanders built in the area and the young settle­ment worked hard to acquire city rights. In fact a very prot­ective city wall was built around Bruges, with solid gates.

The settle­ment very quickly became an imp­or­tant har­bour close to the North Sea. Inside the city, the river and canals became the vital communic­ation links. By the C14th Bruges was the starting point of a commercial transport road to the Rhineland; traders from all over came to sell their pro­ducts and to buy Flemish cloth.



Markt Place, outdoor coffee shops and sculpture (top)
The Beguinage  (second photo)

Growing from a few North German towns in the late 1100s, the Ger­man Hans­eatic League dominated Baltic maritime trade for three cent­ur­ies along the Northern European coast. Bruges bec­ame a port of even greater importance when it joined the Hanseatic League.

St Saviour’s Church was founded in C10th and added to later eg the high alt­ar is C17th. Serious fires may have been the result of wars, accidents or iconoclastic de­struct­ion. But some lovel­y part of this church still stand: C15th choir stalls with the Knights of the Golden Fleece’s arms, or­g­an, clois­ters and treasury.

The Beguinage was founded by Margaret of Constantinople, countess of Fl­an­ders in the mid C13th. Some women were the bereft widows or daughters of knights killed in the Holy Crusades, women who did not want to be secluded nuns but who wanted to do good works. The Beguinage is still a green space and lovely white­washed hous­es; the Beguine Museum enables visitors to feel the C13th.

Markt Place is a central, large square used for all social and political act­iv­it­ies. On one side, the med­ieval bel­fry looms 272' over Markt Place, the proud symbol of the wealth of Bruges since 1282. And there were renovations added during C15th glory days. Inside the belfry, see the trea­s­­ury room; then up 366 steps, past the C18th car­il­l­­on and onto the roof. The 47 bells chime each day.

On the east side of the square is the neo-Gothic Provincial Palace. From 1850, it was used to house the provin­cial govern­ment meetings. Then it became a government meet­ing hall and now a ceremonial building-exhibition space.

The Basilica of the Holy Blood (mid C12th) was built on the site that the First Count of Flan­d­ers built his fort. It did­n't become a chapel until the bones of St Basil the Great AND Holy Blood of Jesus Christ were brought from the Holy Land or Constant­inople (C12th). The ground floor of this double church has its original darkish Romanesque character, while the upper chapel is a totally Gothic storey built in the C15th.

The relic of the Holy Blood is always in the upper chapel, in a tiny cryst­al phial with a golden stopper hung with silver chains. Only on May’s Ascension Day does it move around the town in proud process­ion. The re­l­ic is the respon­s­ib­il­ities of the Con­frat­­ernity of the Precious Blood, town worth­ies celebrated in Pieter Pourbus’ Triptych of the Broth­erhood.

By C14th, Bruges, Ghent and Ypres were the three centres of Belg­ium's amazing cloth trade, using first class raw English wool, ideally suited for weaving Flanders’ lux­ury cloth. Banking and mer­ch­ant houses from all over Europe thrived in Brug­es. The population boomed!

Joined to the Holy Blood Basilica is the old Town Hall. It was built from light cream sand­stone in the Gothic style in the late C14th. The facade has octagonal tur­rets, arched and ribbed windows, and statues of all the counts of Flanders. The Gothic Hall above has stunning mur­als depicting the major events in Brug­es’ history.


Basilica of the Holy Blood, exterior (top) and 
Gothic upper chapel with blood relic (below)

Next door is the more cl­ass­ic­al Palace of Justice. Except for the Magistrates’ Hall, the first building was destroy­ed. The Palace was rebuilt in the 1528-81 per­iod. Other buildings in Burg Square are the Prov­ost's House and the Old Recorder's House, a fine renais­s­ance building topped with statues repres­ent­ing justice.

And see the Church of Notre Dame. Work began on the nave and aisles in c1230 but, typically, more changes were made in the 14th and C15th. The huge tower is 122ms high! Inside Notre Dame Ch­urch is Michelangelo's only known scul­p­tural piece in Belgium, Virgin and Child 1504 in marble. It was brought from Tuscany by a Flemish merchant.

Opposite Our Lady Church is St John’s Hospital, founded in 1188 and one of the oldest in Europe. It still funct­ions as a hospital tod­ay, but a dispensar­y and an old ward have been fitted out as they were back then. In one of the hosp­ital’s old chapels the Hans Mem­ling Museum is located. This artist spent most of his career in Bruges.

Among the amazing coll­ection of Mem­ling paint­ings to be found in Bruges is the altar­piece called The Mys­tic Marriage of St Cath­erine 1479, painted for the Hospi­tal of St John chapel, as was the Mad­onna and Child 1487 and the Hospitallers of St John. The wood­en Rel­iqu­ary of St Urs­ula 1489 is a portable Gothic shrine to Ursula’s 11,000 martyred virgins, covered with exquisite panels.

Bruges was THE creative centre for many of the great Flemish paint­ers, especially when Duke Philip the Good (ruled 1419-67) was com­miss­ion­ing art. Hans Memling, plus Jan van Eyck painted his stun­­n­ing al­tar­piece Adora­t­ion of the Mystic Lamb in Brug­es (1432). Hugo van der Goes (1440-82) also worked in Bruges and left his Portarini Al­tar­piece c1475, paint­ed for a rich Italian banker working in Bruges. Groen­in­ge Museum is a 1930 build­ing with a fine collec­t­ion of Flemish Old Masters: Jan van Eyck, Hugo van der Goes, Hans Memling, Pet­rus Christus, David Gerard, Pieter Pourbus and Hieronymus Bosch. And some C17th Dutch art.

St John's Hospital and Memling Museum along one of the canals

St John Altarpiece by Hans Memling

The decline of Bruges' wealth started in C15th: terrible silt­ing up of the Zwin meant that ships could no longer transport goods to and from Bruges. Plus competition with the bigger harbour of Antwerp resulted in less comm­ercial act­iv­ity. Sadly the coun­try's wealth­iest merchants left Br­ug­es and took their business to An­twerp. The only building flourish were houses and ware­houses with step­ped gables that were built along the canals throughout the C17th.

Today this economic failure to thrive has had an ir­on­ic effect. Bruges was snap-frozen in time and is the best preserved medieval city in western Europe. Even the solid medieval town walls were only torn down in the mid C19th.

The C20th has brought new life because tourists love the medieval heritage, and chocolate. The new harbour of Zeebrugge, 16ks from the city, also brought new industries. Bruges is also home to many interesting art galleries eg The Absolute Art Gallery which promotes the artwork of young and talented Belgian artists, and of international artists - paintings, sculptures, installations and photographs. But the greatest modern fame came from the film, In Bruges (2008), that starred two Irish hit­men, filmed across the city’s iconic cityscape.

The Bruges Triennial 2018 | Liquid City will gather artists and architects from around the world  to leave their mark on the city's public space. From May-September 2018, impressive constructions of contemporary artists and architects will appear in the historic heart of the city.










The late Thelma Webberley, a very fine journalist

$
0
0
Thelma Komesaroff (1923-2015) was a student at University High, an elective school in Melbourne that encouraged its students to stay at school, even throughout the Great Depression and the 1939-45 World War. At a time when most girls and some boys were encouraged to leave school at the minimum legal age, Thelma finished Matricul­ation and was offered a place in the prestigious University of Melbourne. Her passion was English and Russian Literature.
  
Thelma and Les, post retirement

The University did not close during the war, but students whose husbands, fiancés and fathers were recruited into the Armed Serv­ic­es felt obligated to get paying jobs. Thelma married Lieutenant Les Webb­erley (1922-2015) in 1945; she continued working in a city bookshop when Les returned to University after demobilisation, to finish his engine­er­ing deg­ree. 

Once their babies were out of napp­ies, Thelma bec­ame a journalist at The Australian Jewish Herald, pub­lished weekly in Melbourne. After 18 years of columns on music, the arts, travel and community organisations, Thelma took the opport­un­ity to go back to Melbourne University, this time to earn a deg­ree in Journalism. And this time with her daughter (me) on the same campus!

I have already documented Thelma’s community work. Courage to Care offered workshops, presentations, exhibition viewing and facil­it­at­ed discussions designed for high school students. And one section of Bnai Brith Victoria provided scholarships for teach­ers to travel to Israel and to learn in in-depth teaching programmes.

But I have not discussed the rest of Thelma's professional career, intended to be spent as a journalist in tertiary educational institutions.  Only one mid-career move was a surprise, still as a journalist but not in a tertiary educational institution. Thelma was given 3 years to write a history of the Victorian Chamber of Manu­fact­urers in Melbourne, starting in the 1870s in Melbourne. In August 1881 it became the Victorian Chamber of Manufacturers/VCM. It remained an unincorpor­ated association until 1922, when it was incorporated under the Victorian Companies Act. VCM played a role in Australian industrial relations and within a couple of years the Australian Chamber of Manufactur­ers formed the Manufacturing Grocers' Section.

The VCM wanted a book that could be published in time for the cent­ury anniversary of the organisation. The final version of the book ENTERPRISE, 100 Years of the VCM was written by Thelma Webberley, edited by CF Sullivan and published in 1979.

The Victorian Chamber of Manufacturers
across the state of Victoria

Book Orphanage says the book is a hard­cover, 10½" x 7½", with dark-blue cloth-bound boards with gold title to spine, 218 pages, photo­graphs and a foreword by the Premier of Victoria. This book traces the first century of the VCM, which started in one hotel room and, at the time of writing, had 6,000 members and wide influence in industrial matters in Victoria.

Now to the book launch itself. Printed sheets were added inside the book saying Many people contributed to the preparation of this history of the first 100 years of The Victorian Chamber of Manu­factures. Among the members of VCM staff who cont­rib­­ut­ed to the production of the History, were Mr CF Sullivan and Mrs T Webberley. Mr Sullivan was resp­onsible for guiding the com­pilation of the material included in this work while Mrs Webb­erley, in writing the text, did so with great enthusiasm and dedication.

The Foreword was written by the Premier of Victoria, the Honourable RJ Hamer. I was particularly interested to hear the premier say inter alia that the Chamber was interested in technical education, being part of the Administrative Staff College, Council of Public Education, Council of Melbourne University and its Faculty of Economics and Commerce, Victorian Institute of Secondary Education, Victorian University and Schools Education Board.

There are 17 chapters in the book, covering the era of the first men with the first visions (eg Robert Harper, the Chamb­er’s first president) until the completion of the Chamber’s an­n­iversary and its plans for the future. My personal favour­ites were the chapters set in the post-war years and the 1950s, discus­s­ing the Prime Min­is­t­er, The Right Honourable Mr Chifley, socialism, unions and indust­rial­isation. This was a very influential era for my family, and for the primary schools we all went to. 

After the formal speeches in front of Victoria’s dignitaries at the book launch, Thelma Webberley gave the best speech of her profess­ional career. And no time before or since had she ever had three State Ministers shaken her hand on one day!

A separate letter to Thelma Webberley was written directly from Brian Powell, Director of the VCM. Mr Powell’s inv­it­ation to the function on 2nd May 1980 was to thank Thelma in front of the VCM staff, for her writing of the book. That function would mark the internal release of the VCM history “Enterprise”.

The books, printed sheets acknowledging the authorship and editor­ship, and the Director’s personal invitation to Thelma all came to me in my late mother’s library. They are treasured items. Plus I was delighted to find a Victorian Chamber of Manuf­acturers’ Certificate of Membership at the National Wool Museum in Geelong.

 ENTERPRISE, 100 Years of the VCM

                                            
A Decade of Achievement: Phillip Ins­tit­ute of Tech­nol­ogy 

As I said, Thelma intended to spent the rest of her career as a journalist in tertiary education. And she did! Phillip Institute offered Arts, Commerce, Business, Engineering, Social Work and Youth Work. Readers can enjoy Thelma’s career at PIT in Brian Car­r­oll’s A Decade of Achievement: Phillip Ins­tit­ute of Tech­nol­ogy.  Starting his history in 1982, Carroll documented the important contributions made by Thelma's closest colleagues Professor Don Edgar, Betty Churcher (Head of the School of Art and Design) and Henry Talbot (Senior Lecturer in Photography).  Carroll highlighted the quarterly magazine Upfront that was written by Thelma, the means by which the Institute reached out to the local community and northern suburban newspapers.

Later Thelma worked with students and wrote journal artic­l­es, books and newspaper columns at Royal Melbourne Institute of Technol­ogy (now RMIT University). In preparation for RMIT's School of Media and Communication to be developed within the College of Design and Social Context, the journalists and publishers had to work very hard. The School event­ually hosted advertising, audio-visual, communic­ation, creative writing, editing and publishing, film and television, journalism, music industry, photography and public relations.



Can a great book be made into a very good film? On Chesil Beach

$
0
0
I had good reasons for seeing the 2017 film On Chesil Beach. Firstly Ian McEwan is one of the most intriguing modern novelists I have read, espec­ial­ly his 2007 novella of the same name! Secondly the brilliant film Atone­ment was based on Ian McEwan's 2001 novella Atonement and starred, amongst others, Keira Knightley and Saoirse Ronan. Thirdly Chesil Beach was set in 1962, an intriguing time that came just before my personal “Golden Era” of 1965-1970. Finally the book was quite rightly shortlisted for the Booker Prize in 2007, my best guide for selecting novels to read every year.

Author McEwan did the screenplay adaptation, and the film was dir­ected by Dominic Cooke.

The newlywed stars on their honeymoon were both anxious virgins. The new wife was Florence Ponting, a talented and ambitious viol­inist, and the new husband was Edward Mayhew. I remember my grand mother talking about the dangers of sex before marriage, but who discussed the terror of sexual intimacy after marriage?

Saoirse Ronan and Billy Howle, the young stars of Chesil Beach

I assumed “Chesil Beach” was a fanciful location for the film's honeymoon hotel .. because I had never heard the name outside McEwan's novel. Now it turns out that the 18 miles of protected pebble beach along the Dorset coast is real. And famous! What an appropriate and moody location for a brief marriage that ended after a night of disast­rous non-sex. Florence and Edward Mayhew, who came from dif­f­erent backgrounds, had an idyllic courtship. But they never got to consum­mate their marriage, breaking up in tears before doing the deed.

Saoirse Ronan (born 1994) was an inspired Florence, daughter of a wealthy but icy cold family. The Irish act­ress knew how to express an innocence and repress­ion, while rem­aining outwardly charming. The actress herself expl­ained that she had been too young to read McEwan’s book when it had first been released. She was also too young to deal with this very intimate topic and acknowledged that it had to be told in a delic­ate way. Perhaps Ronan didn’t even know about the societal pressure that could accompany physical intimacy back in 1962.

Theatre actor Billy Howle (born 1989) played a character whose work­ing class father was a teacher, while his mother was damaged in an accident; their home was more informal and closer to nature than Florence’s posher background. Edward was a recent university grad­uate (in history) and had decided to become an author. 

Looking down from Abbotsbury Hill onto Chesil Beach, Dorset
Photo credit: The Guardian

Transmission gives a synopsis with extra information that I could not have elucidated myself.  It was a gripping, heart-rending account of a loving relationship battered by outside forces and influences first formed in child­hood, in a society with inflexible rules about uniformity & respectability. They married as virgins: two very different people, but deeply in love. Only hours after their wedding they found themselves at their dull, formal honeymoon hotel on the Dor­set coast at Chesil Beach. They dined in their room, and their conversation became stilted and nervous. 

The consummation of their marriage was fast approaching, and while Edward welcomed the prosp­ect of sexual intimacy, Florence was scared by it. The tension between them boiled over into a heated argument as Florence tried to repel Edward’s advances. She dashed from the room, out of the hotel and on to Chesil Beach, with Edward in pursuit. On a remote part of the beach they had a blazing argument about the profound differences between them. One of them made a startling decision that would have life-long consequences for them both.

But as often happened in the film world, it took a long time for the book to make the transition to the big screen. Yet producer Elizabeth Karlsen had been interested in a film adaptation of the beaut­ifully written novel, even before the On Chesil Beach book was first published.

She noted the simplicity of narrative and the clarity of emot­ion that was already visible. Finding Dominic Cooke, one of Britain’s most eminent theatre directors, Artistic Director at the Royal Court and Associate Director at the National Theatre, was inspired. Cooke was impressed by how the film conveyed the importance of how people talk, or don’t talk about sex, and how people are affected by their upbringings.

Ian McEwan and some of his most famous novels,
Wall St Journal

In 2008, after weeks of concentrating on the job at hand, I created a list of my most loved novels. If I was asked to re-create a favourite list a decade later, it probably would not be very different. But I would certainly have included an Ian McEwan novel or two.

And yes, great books can be made into very good films!








Little Tich - best comedic performer in the world, from 1884 on!

$
0
0
Harry Relph (1867-1928) was the 16th child of a very elderly Kent pub­lican. Harry stood only 4’6” high, with dwarfish legs, and was born with six digits on each hand and foot. His deformities were emphasised for public­ity, although he never wanted to be seen as a handicapped person.

His earliest prof­essional perform­ance in 1880 was at a the Rosherville Gardens Gravesend, a favourite riverside resort. The 12 year old lad made his very first stage appearance with his own black-face comedy act.

Harry took his stage name from an infamous English court case against The Tichborne Claimant that lasted from Ap 1873-Feb 1874, when Harry was still a toddler. In this court case, a Wapping butcher’s son called Arthur Orton turned up from Wagga Wagga in rural Australia. He pretended he was Roger Charles Tit­ch­borne, lost at sea in Ap 1854, and heir to an ancient Hamp­shire baronetcy. Orton, who weighed 25 stones, did 14 years in gaol. He was re­leased on ticket-of-leave in 1884, and later appeared on the music halls, telling of his adventures and prison experience.

Dwarfish Harry Relph took his stage name in an ironic and comedic refer­ence to the huge Tichborne claimant.

Harry Relph, Little Tich, c1900
Wikipedia

Arthur Orton, Tichborne Claimant, 
National Portrait Gallery London 

By the time of his solo London music hall debut in 1884 at 13, Harry had developed a special­ity dance in which he “defied” gravity, either leaning for­ward at a precarious angle or balancing on the tips of long shoes. This eccentric dance became his spec­ial­ty. In his famous flopping Big Boots, 30” in length, Tich danced, leant almost horizontal to retrieve his lost hat, and then rose on tiptoe to become over 7’ tall. Finally he took his bow with another quick horizontal lurch which knocked his bald forehead against the stage.

In Drury Lane, his next London home, pantomime audiences loved Little Tich in the 1891 Humpty Dumpty performance with Dan Leno and Marie Lloyd. Then in 1892 with Hop on My Thumb. Three Drury Lane pantomimes, 1891-94, established him as one of Britain's foremost comedians. To see Harry walk on stage, with his burlesque evening dress, top hat, cigar and his silly smile, made people quickly laugh.

Tich’s music hall earnings made him rich. He loved to ride in a big car around London, and into Kent. But he never forgot his Kentish childhood, his early struggles as a poorly paid performer or his nights in a doss-house.

After succeeding in London, Little Tich went on to triumph over­seas. In 1896 Little Tich made his debut in Paris and became a good friend of very short Toulouse-Lautrec. He was also greatly admired by famous actor-manager Lucien Guitry and his actor-dramatist son Sacha. The young Charlie Chap­l­in, in Paris with Fred Karno's Troupe, saw Tich at the Folies Ber­gère and based his walk on the music hall star  (even though Chaplin became the more famous man).

Also in 1896 Tich app­eared at the Alhambra Theatre London and the Olympia Music Hall in Paris.

Little Tich sang comic songs & was a skilful instrumentalist, but his greatest successes were energetic dances in which he often par­odied artists like Loïe Fuller. Soon Tich was made an officer of the Académie Française for services to French music-hall.

1905’s biggest star on the Australian Tivoli Circuit was Little Tich. This comic little showman commanded a salary that was double the largest sum theatre proprietor Henry Rickards had ever paid to previous stars!!

For 17 years the performer was the toast of the old Tivoli Theatre in Lond­on’s Strand. In an unforgettable show in 1907 Tich was one of the Five Harrys: along with Harrys Laud­er, Tate, Frag­son and Randell. The show was bill­ed as a sensational success.

He was enticed by an American prod­ucer to the USA at 3 times his British salary. Phineas T Barnum was a great show man. There Tich developed a series of hilarious sketches of suburban charact­ers: a love-sick tram conductor, sea-sick sailor, incompetent black­smith and a succession of ecc­entric elderly ladies. He was most famous for his Spanish Senorita, Tax Collector, the Gas Inspector and Little Miss Turpentine.

Famous at home and abroad, his highly vis­ual comic rout­ines inf­luen­ced both stage and early film per­formers. Victorian Cinema reported that the surviving film of the Big Boots dance, made by Clément-Maurice for the Phono-Cinéma-Théâtre in 1900, was a piece of comedic genius. And fans could see Georges Méliès' Le Raid Paris - Monte-Carlo en Deux Heures (1905), Pathé's Little Tich (1907) and Gaumont's Little Tich, the Tec (1909).

Back in Australia Tich told the audience that he was used to play­ing to ladies and gentlemen, not to a mob of hooligans. Then he walked off. After the afternoon papers’ headlines screamed, ‘Little Tich Insults Australian Audiences’, Tich had misgivings about what sort of reception he would get in later perform­ances. But Little Tich was 60 and his big boots and silly songs were no longer univ­er­sally loved. Australians broke his heart. He had come on the stage cocky and energetic; he left it a shaky old man. Tich returned to London but his spirit was never the same again.

Relph was married to three professional entertainers; a] English dancer Laurie Brooks in 1889, b] Spanish dancer Julia Recio in 1898 and c] act­ress Winifred Ivey in 1926. Harry and Winifred’s daughter Mary went on to have a successful stage career of her own.

.
Ealing Hippodrome,
starring Little Tich 1907

His final performance was at the London Alhambra Theatre in 1927, then he died in 1928. Buried in East Finchley Cemetery, Little Tich’s tomb­stone says: le plus petit et le plus grand comique du monde.

See the V&A Theatre and Performance Department collections, including the biographical, productions and photographs files, the library holdings, the Richard Findlater Archive and a pair of the famous Big Boots. Read Little Tich, Giant of the Music Hall by Mary Tich and Richard Findlater, 1979 and Little Tich – Music Hall Star by Gordon Irving.





Intellectual Jewish life in Vienna in the early 20th century - Peter Singer

$
0
0
Here is a blog post of mine, reposted from 23/12/2008 and now modified.

Prof Peter Singer, born safely in Australia straight after the 1939-1945 war, wanted to get to know his late grandfather, David Oppenheim. This was a man who died in the war in 1943, before he could reach a safe place. Luckily for Singer, heaps of documents survived. His aunt, Doris Liffman, had studied some of the letter-based material years earlier for her university degree.

These days I ask my students to read Pushing Time Away ( Ecco, 2003), but not because they are necessarily interested in Peter Singer’s task in discovering his own family history. Rather I want them to un­derstand Viennese Jewish intellectual life from the late C19th until 1933.

Peter Singer's book
with his grandparents' portraits

A new golden age of building came to Vienna, based on the grac­­ious Ring­strasse which was created 1860-90: all the city’s great institutions were lo­cated there. Diff­er­ent from the churches and imperial buildings which were already present in central Vien­na, the new Ringstrasse devel­op­ments were buildings which stressed secular culture, education and the new constitutional government. These included the Parliament, Rathaus, galleries and University. But above all, it was a place for café society to parade and debate.

Vienna was hopping and jumping in this period, creating world lead­ers in medic­ine, psychiatry, chemistry, physics, design, music, architecture, painting, politics, publishing, philosophy and every other intellectual field. The Jewish community of Vienna was largely secular, highly educated and extremely motivated to succeed intellectually.

At the end of the century, 10% of the total pop­ulation of Vienna were Jews. Note that at the same time, c30% of the Akademisches Gymnasium students, 60% of Vienna’s physic­ians and more than 60% of Vienna's lawyers were Jewish.  Ideas were in ferment and Vienna was a very cultivated city. The Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I (1903-7) was a perfect example of integrated Viennese culture. The greatest patron of the Vienna Secession artists was Jewish businessman Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer (although this gorgeous painting by Gustav Klimt was stolen by the Nazis in 1941).


In Oppenheim, Singer found a well placed man to witness Vien­na’s Golden Age. Oppenheim “only” taught classical languages in the high-class Gymansium, so he was not in the cen­tre of Vienna’s in­tellectual ferment at work. But he moved to the cen­­tre in every­thing he did. Oppenheim’s life was lived in cos­mop­olitan Vienna and he could not help contemplating and writ­ing about many of the significant issues that crossed his fertile mind.

Inevitably Oppenheim was drawn into Sigmund Freud’s circle, where his literary and philological skills seemed to be much appreciated. This earned him a footnote in the 1911 edition of The Interpretation of Dreams (suppressed when Oppenheim threw in his lot with the “heretic” Alfred Adler).

I am uncertain what to make of Singer’s grandmother, Amalie Pollack Oppen­heim. She was no intellectual slouch herself, having enrolled at the University of Vienna in 1899; she was only the 39th woman to ever grad­uate from that august institution. But her career went no­where, so one is left to guess that her role was a] raising healthy, happy, educated children and b] supporting her husband in his resear­ch, writing and publications. I was quite interested in the comp­lex­ities of Oppenheim’s and Amalie’s relationship, but I would have loved to have known what contributions to learning Amalie made, outside the home. At least Amalie had the huge good luck and the strength to survive the Nazi camps, and to reach freedom in Australia.

Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer 1, 1907
by Klimt
Neue Galerie, NY

Coffee house culture, c1905 
Vienna, BBC

Historical researchers have to thank families who kept copies of all the letters they wrote and received. Those families had enor­mous foresight! Even had David Oppenheim been born in Ballarat or Leeds, his story would have been worth telling. But Pushing Time Away focused on the critical moments in the Austro-Hungarian Empire’s transition from the late C19th glory days and of learning, to the arrival of Nazism and despair.

In the early decades of C20th Vienna, the city's cultural influences were unsurpassed. So it was impossible that David and Amalie Oppenheim could have known that they had seen the decaying decades of the Austro-Hungarian empire. Could they have understood what the terrible Anschluss in March 1938, when Austria became an integrated part of Germany, revealed?

Andrew Riemer of the Sydney Morning Herald had believed such ideals were destroyed by the ideol­ogical fury of Nazism, the sign of Hitler's true triumph; that post-Holocaust, many Jews sloughed off the rich secular heritage their European ancestors evolved. So Riemer might have been wrong. Peter Singer clearly saw was the continuity between his grand­father's intellectual preferences and his own: a dedication to secular humanism that so many Eur­opean Jews had espoused.  The triumphant brilliant Jewish Viennese culture!

Therefore I suggest that Prof Singer's book subtitle, The Tragedy of Jewish Vienna, should be changed to The Great Successes and Unthinkable Tragedy of Jewish Vienna.





Germany’s Colonial Empire 1884-1918: Deutsches Historisches Museum

$
0
0
Britain, France, Spain, Portugal, Netherlands etc had booming colonial empires, often after long and brutal struggles against local citizens. By the late 19th century, Germany also wanted colonies.

We need to start with Germany's unification in 1871. Although the German Empire went on to become a European colonial power unt­il the end of WW1, it might be difficult for the modern historian to see how colonial power entered pub­lic cons­ciousness. Certainly not from Otto von Bismarck and the politicians in the Reichstag who felt they had enough
 problems to deal with, inside the new German nation.

However it must be noted that there were many geog­raphical assoc­iat­ions and colonial societ­ies in Germany. And there were many German citizens who moved to the colonies, temporarily or for the long term: missionaries, civil serv­ants, military people, settl­ers and merch­ants.

In 1884 Bismarck reluctantly changed his mind. In order to protect trade, to safeguard raw materials and ex­p­ort markets and to build capital investment, he approved the acqu­is­ition of colonies by the German Empire.

Map of German colonies in black
Plus Pacific islands and Chinese concessions in red

As a straggler in the race for colonies, Germ­any had to agree to four less-than-desirable Protectorates.

A) In South West Africa, they colon­ised Namibia (1884-1918).

B) In East Africa, the Germans colonised the nations now called Cameroon, Togo, Tanzania, Uganda, Burundi, Kenya, Mozambique and Rwanda (1891-1918).

C) To protect German trading interests in the Pacific and to take ad­van­tage of British failures, the German Government annexed north eastern New Guinea in 1884. The Marshall and the Sol­omon Is­lands were annexed in 1885. The Germans took over Nauru, then annexed Samoa to acquire forced labour for its plant­at­ions.

D) In China, Qingdao Treaty Port became the German bay conces­s­ion of Tsing­tau, leased by the Qing Dynasty. From 1898-1914, it was the cent­re for German commercial development in China and a base for the Imp­erial German Navy.

German military forces had to battle against many angry marches, to lock up or execute local trouble makers. Perhaps it was because Ger­many became involved in empire building much later than the other Europeans, and were therefore less experienced. Africans resisted the an­nex­ation of their territories, which led to violent colon­ial wars. Genocide in Namibia was infamous as one of the first examples of gen­ocide in the C20th. Between 1904-05, tens of thousands of rebelling Herero and Namaqua died when the German army destroyed supplies of food and water. Afterwards, the colonising army drove refugees into the Namib Desert.

Germany committed its first mass deaths in Namibia against the Namas and the Hereros, from 1904 to 1907, often in camps.

In Tanzania in German East Africa, the 1905 Maji-Maji War was another devast­ating event for the local population. The Maji Majis had to work in labour gangs to build roads and grow cotton, but they died from largely from German-organised famine.

Even in times of peace, the military forces employed the Maxim machine gun to rein­force their rule and bring home the super­iority of the Europeans to the colonised peoples. The machine gun was sometimes used to decimate whole groves of trees in a short period of time to engender fear, or destroy food.

These genocides were a source of tension between the German Empire and other European powers, espec­ially Britain and France. This was even though a] Germany did not have the military resources to ser­iously compete and v] Britain and France had their own colonial wars and their own brutal colonial histories.

A conference was organised by Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, with represent­at­ives of 14 nations, but no Africans were invited. The General Act of the Berlin Conference of 1884-5 formalised the Scramble for Africa, and eliminated most existing forms of Afric­an self-rule. Ger­many was placing colon­ialism in its pan-European context, and public­ising its sudden emergence as an imperial power.

German colonial efforts, des­pite being limited, did not create a happy time in world history. So it did not surprise historians that early in WWI, most of Germany’s African and Pacific colonies were occupied by other Euro­pean colonial powers. Only in German East Af­rica did the Generals and African mercenaries persevere until the end of the war.

Perhaps because of its tradition of expansion within Europe, Ger­m­any's renewed attempt to conquer Europe in WWI resulted in loss of its overseas possessions. Post-WW1 Germany was strip­ped of all its colonies under the 1919 Treaty of Versailles. The confis­cated terr­itories were dist­ributed to the victors, under the new system of mandates set up by the League of Nations.

Thus the German colonial empire ended. Yet colonial consciousness did not disappear. Nazi Germany’s attempt to acquire new Eur­o­p­ean “colon­ies” before and during WW2 started with the annexation of Aus­tria and Czechoslovakia. Then Germany wanted parts of Poland, Ukraine, Russia and Baltic states. Undoubtedly there was a legitimate  concern for the millions of ethnic Germans who lived there, but that would have led to the unif­ic­ation of Greater Germany, not colonisation of unrelated European nations.

A German colonial army
in khaki uniforms and helmets

For the first time Berlin's Deutsches Historisches Museum has focused on German colonialism in an exhib­it­ion called  German Colonialism Fragments Past and Present (Oct 2016-May 2017).

Displays dealt with German colonialism via paint­ings, graphics, everyday objects, posters, documents, photo­graphs, colonial wares, toys and travel rep­orts from Germans and locals. One example. European civil servants and military trav­el­lers from all the colonial powers wore tropical helmets made of pith or cork. Used extensively across all the tropical col­on­ies, the helmets offered pro­t­ection against sun and rain for Imp­er­ial German Officials. The helmet became a fixture of the colon­ial dress code and a sign of membership of the racially-defined rulers.

The exhibition examined the motives of the German mission­aries, ad­minist­rators, military forces, settlers and merchants, as well as the interests of the colonised people. And it examined whether the pers­pectives of the colonised peoples were included in the historical tradition.

The exhibition published by an excellent booklet in German and English. From this catalogue, I was most interested in the under­lying id­eol­ogy of colonialism, worldwide political riv­alry with other col­onial powers, and the pursuit of economic power in the 19th and early C20th. The discussion of German dom­in­ation, with its viol­ence, crush­ing of rebellions and genocide, was harsher. Nonetheless the exhibition did inform current debates about the recognition of gen­oc­­ides.





Viewing all 1213 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images